• @Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      It’d be a damn shame if you accidently downloaded cloudstream, an android app that allows you to download and watch offline, or just stream nearly any show or movie. I wouldn’t recommend the super stream source, as it almost always has a version available. Also, just in case, maybe don’t download tachiyomi to allow you to read any comics, manga, or graphic novels you want. It also has shitloads of hentai and pulls from almost every website imaginable.

      And avoid Anna’s archive, as it has tons of ebooks which might(I’m not a lawyer) actually just be legal?

    • @SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You absolutely should not subscribe to a VPN before not visiting any of those sites. I can’t recommend www.privateinternetaccess.com or www.expressvpn.com at all, clearly having never used them. They’re also useless for circumventing cell network limitations on video quality. Completely useless, otherwise I’d use them to subscribe to a cheaper lower data tier but still get 4k video.

      • Free Palestine 🇵🇸
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        Btw, you should also never get a seedbox to torrent anonymously. You also need to stay away from private trackers.

    • @MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      Imagine if people set up a Plex/Jellyfin after visiting those sites to have their own streaming service setup. Pure madness!

    • @firadin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      So like what’s the actual deal with pirating content nowadays? I remember in the early 2000s it was don’t seed and don’t torrent just-released content and you won’t get caught. Are the companies more rigorous nowadays? Are they going after people and you really do need a VPN? Can you torrent content at a human-watchable pace (like a show or two a month, maybe a movie or two a week) and no one’s going to notice you?

      • @The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        Depends on the country. In the U.S., instead of chasing users themselves, they have leveraged the Internet providers to act as enforcers. If you torrent something they first send you notice of violation from your Internet provider.

        If you continue to torrent, they can
        cancel your service or the copyright holder can start legal action.

        Honestly, I would never torrent anything anymore. There are great webpages that offer streaming for no cost.

        • Free Palestine 🇵🇸
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          A direct download/streaming site can be shut down at any time. Torrents are resistant to censorship, as they are decentralized. Just grab a good VPN or a seedbox and you can torrent as much as you want.

      • @Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Just get a VPN and torrent like normal in the 2000s. Nothing has changed. Seeding is not really a big deal anymore because everyone’s internet speeds are so fast.

    • @Stephen304@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Also definitely dont look into setting up sonarr, radarr, prowlarr, and overseerr in combination with Plex or jellyseerr in combination with jellyfin. Otherwise you could find yourself with an extremely low touch automated downloading and organizing system that you can let your friends log into to request movies and shows without them needing to bug you at all for it to be downloaded in your preferred quality, size, codec, etc and automatically show up in Plex/jellyfin as soon as it finishes downloading, all renamed and sorted into folders as you please. That would be horrible.

  • @Szymon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    134
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I dust off my robe and wizard hat.

    Plex is a great streaming alternative. Cancelling Netflix pays for the upgrade to gigabit Internet. Hard drives are cheaper now than ever. Usenet access remains safe and speedy. The DIY community for automation is thriving.

    Is that the Jolly Roger coming in to port? Welcome back old friends.

      • @Jarmer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        542 years ago

        I MUCH prefer Jellyfin to Plex. Jellyfin seems to have active development whereas Plex is more interested in adding in a ton of “features” (aka garbage) that I never ever wanted and continues to leave YEARS old bugs out in the wild. I think it won’t be long until Plex enshittifies itself to death. They clearly have a financial situation that is not aligned with its users.

        • @Szymon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          I agree, I’ll give the software another try once I have more free time to learn and troubleshoot

          • @EeeDawg101@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            Infuse is only $10 per year and that includes on your Apple TV and iPhone. It really is quite slick and looks really good.

            • @Jarmer@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              Agreed. This is not expensive at all. 100% worth the value which is less than a dollar a month.

            • @whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              FWIW, my Plex Pass has worked to be much less than that since I purchased it.

              Much (not all) of the negative I see about Plex is associated with cost of a Plex Pass. If subscribing monthly, it costs more. If you play the long game with the Lifetime Pass, it’s dirt cheap and pretty darn solid.

        • @GreenMario@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Plex has a client on my TV and Xbox. How would I watch Jellyfin content on those?

          I say this a guy that got his RasPi3 Plex server running just good and stable a year ago and doesn’t touch it except to cycle in new content.

          • @mark3748@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            You could use Emby instead. Jellyfin is the FOSS version of Emby and Emby has apps for everything. I moved to Emby from Plex five years ago or so and it’s been great.

          • @Camilo@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            In the worst case scenario, you can access it via browser and then bookmark it.

            I do that on my tv for which almost no apps can be installed and found no issues so far. Even HDR media plays, which I found that it is (or was?) a paid feature on Plex

        • Obinice
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Unfortunately, there’s no Jellyfin application on my TV, or I’d swap :-(

        • @ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Jellyfin feels like it’s 95% of the way there. I switched from Plex to Jellyfin back to Plex again a year or two ago, but I am thinking I should give Jellyfin another shot some time. There was some media that Jellyfin wasn’t able to play even without transcoding that Plex handled fine, but those transcoding issues could be solved by now.

      • @Szymon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I tried but the technical gap from Plex to Jellyfin was too intense for me to try and make work at this time of my life. Plex works well for my purposes and I paid for the phone apps when needed ($6 per device I think).

        I admire and support Jellyfin as FOSS and hope I can jump on when I have more time to make it work.

        • @Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Yeah for sure, didn’t mean to imply folks shouldn’t use Plex just giving it a shout out as an alternative. I’ve used both and they are both pretty awesome. One of my friends set up a seed box with Jellyfin so I kinda cheated in leaving the tinkering to them but I don’t think it was too bad with the provider they went with.

        • BolexForSoup
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Exact same thing happened to me, i just couldn’t get it to consistently work.

      • MaggiWuerze
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        I can’t for the life of me get HW encoding working with Jellyfin. Plex was just plug and play.

        i7-11800H

      • @three@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -92 years ago

        worth checking out until you get to the cry for developers that they posted yesterday. fuck switching my media serving to a dying platform

    • @flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      Yep. Finally got Radarr and Sonarr with overseerr setup this summer because I need a GUI solution for my family. It’s been working pretty great so far!

      • @HeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        I have the same but the one thing I can’t get working is accessing overseer from outside the network (ie internet). I’ve read guides of course but at some point they start talking about domains and certificate signing and I start to have a siezure.

        • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Look into Caddy, it’s by far the easiest web server/reverse proxy with automatic SSL support out there. Setup both Caddy and Overseer in Docker and then just simply write

          overseer.yourdomain.com {

          reverse_proxy overseer:overseer port

          }

          Assuming you have you own domain name and have DNS records setup.

          I was using Nginx and Let’s Encrypt for years but it was a bit of a pain in the ass. I just rewrote my entire Docker Compose script to use Caddy so I can deploy everything in about 5 minutes.

          • @kaitco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Any thoughts on using something like Caddy, or any other reverse proxy option, if you already have a VPN that you pay for?

            Currently I’m using Tailscale for my phone and tablet, but there’s not really an option for Roku outside of my home network. I’d like to give a friend access to my Jellyfin, but I can’t seem to get anything working other than Tailscale because I already pay for ProtonVPN.

            • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Routing the reverse proxy through the VPN just complicates things. I’m assuming you mean you want to give a friend access to your Jellyfin server, not your Roku (not sure why you mentioned that), so just have Caddy listen on ports 80 and 443, and forward the ports on your router. Then setup the reverse proxy lines for Jellyfin in the Caddyfile. Assuming you already have DNS setup you should be good to go, just give your friend the URL. Caddy enables SSL by default so there really is no reason to route the traffic through a VPN tunnel. I’m pretty sure the Jellyfin docs have a section for using Caddy as a reverse proxy.

              • @kaitco@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                I’ll have to check again on the Jellyfin docs, but when I was las trying to follow the steps, I ran into an issue where some IP didn’t match something else and it told me I couldn’t continue.

                My friend uses a Roku so getting him to use Tailscale or anything like it isn’t really an option.

                • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah, I think you’re confused 😉 There is no need for your friend to use a VPN to access your Jellyfin server. All you need to do is make it publicly accessible and tell him where to find it (the URL).

                  It can literally be as simple as setting up NAT on your router (commonly known as port forwarding, linking the IP of the Jellyfin server and it’s port to a designated port on your router accessible via your public IP) and then giving your friend your public IP and the port that you opened. THIS IS HIGHLY DISCOURAGED THOUGH SINCE NOTHING IS ENCRYPTED.

                  It’s best to setup either Dynamic DNS (usually free, but you don’t get your own domain name, usually just a subdomain under their domain name) or buy your own domain name for cheap (like $10-$30 USD/year) and setup your A records (and CNAME records if you want) in the hosted DNS section. Once you have DNS working then setup a reverse proxy using something like Caddy (simple), Traefik (more complex), or Nginx (a full blown, complex web server) and Certbot/LetsEncrypt. SSL certs and reverse proxies can be a pain in the ass sometimes, but Caddy makes it dead simple.

                  From there just give your friend your URL (https://jellyfin.yourserver.com or however you have it setup). He puts that in the connection box in the Jellyfin UI and it should work as intended.

        • @cor315@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I just set up a VPN with wire guard and duckdns. Connected my phone and works great. Some one will mention a show and I’ll pull out my phone and add it via overseer. Get it on plex in like 2 minutes.

    • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Plex is cracking down on pirated content. They can’t do anything locally (yet) but they sent out a mass email about two weeks ago saying that anyone that hosts a Plex server in the cloud (they didn’t specifically mention Hetzner, but that’s who is largely being affected) will lose access on October 12th.

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        People thought hosting copyrighted content on someone’s cloud and making it available to others was a good idea? 🤦🤦‍♀️🤦‍♂️

        This is why we can’t have nice things.

        • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          It’s specifically people doing this and selling access to the servers en masse, like these servers have a hundred or more users each. The don’t care about the small fish that are doing this privately for no monetary gain.

          • Avid Amoeba
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Yeah, I guess it’s often profit-driven. If you can get $5 per month from 100 people, you can probably clear hundreds of dollars per month. So that ten times, and this becomes quite a serious profit stream.

      • PorkSoda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Plex is cracking down on pirated content.

        I’m just as jaded and cynical as the next guy, but I think that this is a mischaracterization of that email. People were hosting Plex servers with thousands of users and terabytes of pirated content on Hetzner and selling access. I don’t read them taking action as a signal for them blocking local libraries in the future.

        • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          They all do it just to get the lawyers off their backs. Plex is just a bigger target. Plex can’t block anything locally so they take action against user distributing pirated content on a cloud service and are like “Here, we took action, can you leave us alone now?”. It would practically be impossible for them to block the distribution of pirated content at the local level.

          Plex fucked up when they created their Client-Server model because it allows traffic to run through their servers (the Plex Relay and their “phone home” model). This makes them legally responsible for “facilitating access to pirated content” even though they don’t host the content. Jellyfin doesn’t have this pitfall since you host everything yourself, they just provide the software.

          You’re the second person that says " Plex isn’t cracking down on pirated content… but they’re banning people who are hosting servers with pirated content." If that’s not " cracking down on pirated content" IDK what is…

        • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Yeah, people act like Plex and other media servers are used for legally obtained content only. Plex is just covering their asses and they can’t block users hosting locally so this is a “here we did something, are you happy now?” to the copyright lawyers.

      • @Szymon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Good to know, hopefully this creates a drive to make alternatives a little more user friendly to set up

        • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          It’s easy to setup remote access to Jellyfin… once you know what you’re doing. I’ve been doing it for years, and just recently gave Caddy a try as my reverse proxy and it literally takes 3 lines of code to create a SSL secured reverse proxy (literally just Jellyfin.yourfqnd.com { reverse_proxy Jellyfin:8096}).

          I’ve written a docker compose file for each of my categories of apps on my server: Plex, Jellyfin, Admin apps, and Pirating. The Caddy config file is simple so I just copy that to its app directory. My DNS and my CNAME records are already set.

          So after a bit of work writing the aforementioned scripts I can have my entire setup on a new server in about 5 minutes and one command.

          IDK if docker-compose works on Windows, but I’m happy to share it if you run Linux.

    • @rizoid@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Is there any links/guides on how to get into the usenet side of things? I’ve been using torrents forever but people keep saying usenet is safer.

      • @Szymon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Google/learn about/consider these things

        VPN, Usenet provider (i.e. EasyNews), Usenet indexers (i.e. NZBgeek), Usenet client (i.e. NZBget), Managing your library (Sonarr, Radar, Prowlarr, Filebot),

        Media server & streaming (i.e. Plex, Jellyfin)

        I watch through my firestick or android phones

        I might be missing something, but there are lots of guides once you figure out what you’re looking for. A little technical know-how makes things go smoother and faster though.

        • @TaintPuncher@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          I tried to get into Usenet but I’m old and unable to learn new tricks. I just looked at EasyNews and it’s $9.99 pm for 20GB :| so, like, a single 4K movie with Atmos. I don’t understand the allure of UseNet, perhaps because I am a dumb.

        • @rizoid@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Thanks for the info. I’ve got. Sonarr radarr and prowlarr set up with qbitt right now and jellyfin. I’ll have to do some digging this weekend.

          • Maximilious
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            Worth mentioning that NZBget is no longer in development. It still works but there is a fork out of a new client someone is developing. I can’t recall the name but easily findable. This would be the equivalent of your torrent client.

            It’s nearing year end and you can get end of year deals soon on providers and indexers so off hold off until November\December. I think I got a lifetime NZBGeek membership last year for like $100 or something. It was my first time doing usenet but I actually switched my instances to use usenet indexers first over torrent indexers its that good.

          • @Szymon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            There’s a few recent guides on Reddit that discuss this and automation. I got access to some private torrent trackers this year, but haven’t touched them since I got my Usenet subscription. I’ve been waiting decades for it to be this easy once you get it set up.

            If you already have that automation part going, this should be pretty straight forward. Add a Usenet download client to your *arr programs, put in the account info from your Usenet provider, add on your account info for nzb trackers, and it works just the same except with more consistency and speed.

  • @gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    100
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    the capitalists are unable to understand that the “eternal growth” their books mention is not feasible in real world and in fact it is a bug. There are physical upper limits that cannot be overcome. There will not be unlimited people that will always enrol in a new subscription. They need to somehow understand that at some point a company may reach their ceiling. This is not reason to do whatever panic change in order to show growth in the numbers. It will just not happen.

    • @eronth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      The thing is, they do know this. They are perfectly willing to drive a company into the ground on the promise of annual growth, and they’ll dump it the moment it cannot serve them monetarily.

    • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Lies!

      It’s mathematically possible to have infinite growth as long as it’s in nominal terms and you have infinite inflation!

      (Joke aside, ponder on why central banks have a positive non-zero inflation target…)

  • @Number1SummerJam@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    782 years ago

    When will the greed stop? At what point will these corporations realize that the average American is completely stretched thin financially and will have to cease unnecessary expenses? They’re all just shooting themselves in the foot.

      • @CosmoNova@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        382 years ago

        It‘s laughable to expect corporations to act against their only purpose. As soon as a company sells shares it takes the route of infinite growth which is impossible. First they grow their user base and once they start to inevitably stagnate, they start milking their costumers, shaving off features and laying off workers in order to grow their income. It is really the only way for them to remain existent when the market is saturated. They cannot stay in business when they make billions a year when these billions aren‘t even more billions than last year. You can‘t attract new investors that way and therefore cannot continue to exist. Enshittyfication only just started. It cannot possibly get better when they can‘t expand their user base, only worse. They know they will self destruct eventually, but that doesn‘t matter as long as shareholders get their piece of the cake and jump ship to sink the next one. Just being a massively profitable company is bad business if you‘re not growing. That‘s the state of capitalism we‘re in.

        • @kinsnik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          As soon as a company sells shares it takes the route of infinite growth which is impossible

          yeah, the stock market makes that a company that is stable and generates a reliable income each year is seen as bad, but a company that has large grow in obviously unsustainable speed, which doesn’t have plans on how to ever become profitable is good (i am not specifically taking about netflix here)

      • @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        When the platform dies.

        “first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. “

        Source

      • @AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Incorrect.

        It will stop when our species exterminates itself out of greed.

        Climate change will probably only thin our numbers by the billions as a result of of the owner’s greed, but then they want to profit off AI, and CRISPR, and innumerable other potentially profitable means to our self-extinction.

        The greed will stop when all the humans are dead almost certainly by our own hands, and humans are actively working to accomplish this.

    • @AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      282 years ago

      As consolidation continues corporations do not need to compete on prices as there are no alternatives. Yes people will pirate but they’ve already lobbied vendors to embrace DRM and governments to make it illegal so that makes it as annoying as possible.

      • @Carobu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        182 years ago

        Are we reading the same thing? Netflix has more competition now than it ever has. When Netflix had cheaper prices when it has no competition than it does now. Piracy has been making a huge resurgence as well.

        • @query@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          142 years ago

          “More competition” meaning less access, people having to pay for multiple different services instead of having it in one place.

          The competition should be about having the best platform, not exclusive content. There’s no reason why the same show couldn’t be on two different platforms. And available globally. Practically, all you really need is more local servers for where there’s more traffic.

          • Goronmon
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The competition should be about having the best platform, not exclusive content.

            Those both sound like competition to me. What you are really asking for is “I want things to be cheaper” which is a separate and sometimes related issue to competition, but separate nonetheless.

            The path to lower prices the way you want would be government-mandated price controls on the industry.

            • @SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The path to lower prices the way you want would be government-mandated price controls on the industry.

              Now you’re just talking dirty cause you can.

            • partial_accumen
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              The path to lower prices the way you want would be government-mandated price controls on the industry.

              Mandatory price controls can be tricky economically. I could certainly consider them on thinks required for living (food, housing, fuel), but putting them on optional entertainment like streaming? That sounds very counter productive.

        • @AProfessional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          When Netflix started they entered the market as a licensor of content from studios to be distributed as part of a streaming service.

          This possibility largely no longer exists. All of the studios have bought out competition, stopped licensing a lot of their popular content, and now release their content themselves. This means there is little competition in the film distribution market for streaming, beyond PayPerView.

    • @Fribbtastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      As long as people pay for it and they make massive profits through it.

      I mean, look at the last situation in which netflix addressed account sharing. Their user number actually increased because of it from what I have read.

      Those people that can’t afford it will most likely switch to a less expensive tier and then probably see ads. I have seen that recently with my father who wasn’t even bothered or annoyed by the constant ads while watching a single episode.

      • @Wisely@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I don’t understand how people are ok with ads? They annoy me so much. It’s wasting your time so it can attempt to manipulate you into buying stuff with the money you can’t afford to spend.

    • @Ado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      We keep saying this but they keep profiting more and more every time lol. Remember when everyone on reddit was gonna quit Netflix for the password sharing block? Ya, their users increased afterwards.

    • FunkyMonk
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      AND KILL THE AMERICAN DREAM THAT ANY MAN CAN BE KING?! might as well just side with those broke natives /s

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    652 years ago

    We should all know that Netflix’s method of “throwing money at the wall and hope one of the shows becomes a hit, cancel immediately after a season if it doesn’t work out” is completely unsustainable at this point, as this kind of dehumanizing disposablilty of production is the exact " industry disruptive" approach to expect from a bunch of arrogant Silicon Valley techbros, so this cost increase should not come as a surprise.

    Many long running shows have had pretty bad first seasons, “Parks and Rec”, the US version of “The Office”, and “The Simpsons” comes to mind, and these shows would never have even gotten off the ground if Netflix was running them, because as with all industries, it takes a while for people to find their footing and get to know each other to work together effectively.

    The real sad part is, the industry that has copied Netflix’s “disruptive” approach are now finding out that the emperor has no clothes and are desperately trying to pass the cost off to anybody else for their own survival, which is why it is more important than ever to fight for the dignities of the people who worked on your favorite shows for your entertainment.

    • @Metatronz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 years ago

      I could very well be mistaken and please correct me if I am. I remember reading that canning a show before season 3 or so was a way of getting around union costs that kick in for a ‘longer’ running show. A very anti labor strategy designed to cash in quickly then drop it so Netflix wouldn’t have to share the wealth.

    • @MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      To be frank, I don’t think they care about anything else other than keeping people on the platform. Which is not such a bad goal to be had if they tried to achieve that with quality of service, good offering of entertainment, etc. What they are doing is desperately trying to create some long running series where on which people will get hooked and won’t be able to leave even if everything else starts sucking. Should this ever happen I think we can fully expect their next step to be reduced amount of licensing towards other shows and movies.

      But as you rightly put it, you can’t grow forever and ever increasing revenue can only be had in dreams.

      • Billiam
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Actually, I don’t think they care about retention at all, because to the industry retention = stagnation. They only care about new subscribers because that “shows” growth. They much prefer hearing “We increased subscriber counts by 10%!” over “We kept 100% of subscribers YoY!”

  • 👁️👄👁️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    602 years ago

    They’re not even slowly raising prices, they are very rapidly raising them. We’ve reinvented cable.

    • @Isakk86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Actually, cable didn’t even raise prices this fast. We’ve, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with capitalism, created something worse.

    • @MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Perhaps they realized number of people that keeps paying versus number of people who cancel their subscription results in net positive revenue, so they are testing where the line is. All the while trying to fund some new content to get more people to come back.

      • 👁️👄👁️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I wouldn’t doubt there’s collusion. It’s very convenient that none of these services are taking advantage of this and are seemingly raising all of their prices simultaneously.

    • @Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yea I didn’t but I’ll cancel this time.

      Should make an event with other people. Set a date and cancel all at the same time.

      I suck at modding communities but I’d help promote and join any if someone got it going.

  • Boozilla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Thanks for reminding me that I haven’t even watched Netflix in a minute. I cancelled it. Fuck them.

  • Used/Denied
    link
    fedilink
    English
    522 years ago

    Never mind the price, Netflix just doesn’t have stuff I want to watch anymore.

    • @rckclmbr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Netflix does have good shows, but they’re just so few and far in between. I stopped my subscription about a year ago, and haven’t missed it. I’ll resubscribe this month to watch Fall of the House of Usher, then unsub again just because there’s nothing to watch.

      Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if others are doing this, the streaming companies catch on, and we pay a bulk amount for a season a la early iTunes again

      • 8rhn6t6s
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        I agree, I just hate that when they do have good shows they cancel it immediately 🤦. I cringed when they canceled 1899 and inside job.

    • @SitD@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      they outplayed you 😂 you might be paying $0, but you can’t stop them anymore from charging you 2x$0 next year

    • @FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      I canceled after they lost Star Trek. And then I never subscribed to the place that does have Star Trek now. Now I’m so annoyed with all of the price hikes that I may only ever subscribe to the high seas going forward. Lol

  • @TheDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    512 years ago

    I’ve been a Netflix customer for over 20 years. The recent password crackdown and constant price gouging led me to cancel their service yesterday. Yo Ho MF’ers.

    • @Archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      I canceled just after the CEO said that paid customers could be getting ads. Knew that was the beginning of the end

  • @Arethusa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Sounds like Netflix is panicking and scrambling. The frequency of their subscription hikes increases and increases. Perhaps they think they can price hike their way out of the dissatisfaction they have delivered to subscribers. Keep trying Netflix, find that magic subscription price point that will surely cover for all the subscribers you’re shedding with your idiocy and will definitely not hasten your arrival to 0% revenue. Increasing that price won’t lose you more subscribers right? Of course not. Burn Netflix burn.

    • @Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      More like they took on a shitload of very low interest debt back when the fed rate was 0%. Now that the fed rate is 5.5%, they can’t just roll over the loans and have to start paying them back.

    • @JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      They’re finding the optimal price point. Each time they raise they lose some customers, but their increased revenue leads them to being more profitable afterwards. Eventually the price increases will result in so many people leaving that they’ll have to stop.

      Problem is, this strategy has exactly one direction: irrelevance. It can take a very long time to get there, but eventually you lose so many subscribers that your competitors have begun eating your lunch. The profits were solid so you didn’t care. It’s the normal business life cycle, and Netflix is well into the mature phase. We have worse quality and higher prices to look forward to.

      • @Arethusa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Netflix’s lowered revenue growth is the highlight. That’s what they and their investors focus on, with subscriber satisfaction being an afterthought. The price hikes haven’t shown any effect on that downward trend either. But hey, keep hiking I say. Fires burn bigger when fuel is added and these people can’t differentiate water from gasoline. Having washed my hands of this company, I’m looking forward to further scrambling when revenue growth is nil and then negative and the stock drops and drops and the corporatists wail.

  • rynzcycle
    link
    fedilink
    482 years ago

    Ah yes, because derivative reality shows and bottom-of-the-barrel adult cartoons are so expensive to produce.

    What the hell happened, you used to be good.

    Just cancelled, haven’t touched NF since I subbed to HBO (and even that is getting cancelled next month). Maybe its time to try Hulu.

    • @iheartneopets@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 years ago

      Hulu will still show ads for some things, even if you pay extra for ad free. Pisses me off, they’re a terrible company. They’ll never get another dime from me.

        • @iheartneopets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Idk why you’re trying to tell me bullshit to something I experienced for myself, but okay. I can tell you that it did happen and it pissed me off, and it was enough to make me never want to go back. Plus (I’m not sure if this is still the case) they wouldn’t let me fast-forward commercials on programs I had recorded from their live TV programs. Even though I had also paid the extra there to get no/fewer ads. Something like $80 a month at the time.

          So yeah, no bullshit. Sorry to disappoint you.

          • @uberkalden@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            I don’t know what the fuck you paid for, but it wasn’t the ad free service the rest of us got. They have a web page dedicated to explaining the few exceptions they had to ad-free. Live TV is a separate thing from normal Hulu. Are you confusing the two?

            • @iheartneopets@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Idk why you’re coming at me, dude. Does Hulu pay your bills or something? Like I said, I’m just describing my experience, idk why you’re being a confrontational ass about it.

              • @uberkalden@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 years ago

                Maybe my language was confrontational, so that’s on me. You are describing something that is wrong, over and over. From what I can gather, you saw ads on Hulu TV and got mad since you are paying for no ads. They are two different services though and ad free doesn’t apply to the Hulu TV stuff. I asked if you were maybe confusing the two, but ignored that.

                • @iheartneopets@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  02 years ago

                  Honestly I don’t know why you care so much. This isn’t debate class, I don’t really need to defend myself to some rando on the internet who decided to make a corporation their white-knight crusade for the day. I detailed an experience I had with the company a few years back. That’s it. I’m not going back to them, because like most streaming platforms I think they’re shite.

          • @uberkalden@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Oh my God. Grow up. No one here even watched those shows

            Edit: I just checked. It’s greys anatomy. That’s it. And it’s out of their control. Now, if you watch that show, definitely a deal breaker. Cancel Hulu. Otherwise, what are we even talking about?

      • @Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        They’re not great, but I haven’t seen any ads on ad free. Their interface is weird as hell and it almost seems like they purposely bury things you’ve recently been watching which is weird.

        • @iheartneopets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 years ago

          It’s not on all things, only some programs, but it was enough that it upset me because they were charging me for ‘ad free’ and didn’t even warn me that some things would have ads.

      • @criticon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        No it doesn’t. At most it shows what channel produces the show you are watching and when to expect more episodes, and it takes less than 5 seconds

        • @iheartneopets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 years ago

          Yes it does, or it did when I was subscribed. It was usually on reality type shows like HGTV or other similar things. I also hated that it wouldn’t let me skip ads on things I had recorded on live TV. They also have had shitty no-account sharing policies since before Netflix enraged everyone with their plan for that. I remember them not letting me watch from my account because I wasn’t at my set home address.

          Don’t know what to tell you. Their services were charging way too much to be limiting features like that, and I’m not going back. At least YouTube TV lets you skip ads in recorded programs.

      • @firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        They used to do that for a handful of shows due to streaming contracts, but last time I checked (~2019) it was literally two shows. Is it more now?

        • @iheartneopets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          To me, it seemed to be any show that also showed on live TV stations or something? I didn’t know the exact reasons, but it did seem to happen with things affiliated with certain TV stations. But the fact that they do/have done it at all is enough to turn me off.

          Edit: I haven’t been subscribed since probably 2021, so I have no idea how it is now.

    • @Number1SummerJam@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      I say we should collectively strike from streaming platforms to send a message. If you want to watch shows, collect DVDs from the library or thrift store and rip them to a USB drive. If you have a newer TV with a built in media player, it can read the video formats on the USB drive for quick access to your favorite shows.

      • rynzcycle
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Im at a stage where I am more than happy to pay for really good shows. It really isn’t about price, just value. It’s just been ages since NF made anything stellar.

        They said about The OA (I loved season 1)…

        Neflix describes The OA as “a big creative swing we were proud to take,” but says that when it comes to deciding what to renew and what to cancel, “viewing versus cost” is always what it takes into account.

        This philosophy means we get loads of average crap. They aren’t a regular network, why the hell are they acting like it.

        I’ve said before, because it’s linked with delivery, Prime seems to be the only service willing to take risks, and they make some great stuff because of it. HBO seems to be a distant second.

        • @Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          When I saw OA, I thought holy shit Netflix really gets it, this is amazing, I can’t wait to see what comes next. And now it’s like a special on the Johnny Depp trial and a bunch of depressing drama / horror shows. There was a brief golden age but nothing really good since Covid.

    • Maximilious
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Funny enough I just cancelled my Hulu after they jacked the ad-free price up to $18. It was $12 when I first subscribed about 6 or 7 years ago.

      I will say thier D+ and Hulu price doesn’t seem bad with the current promotion, but I’m getting D+ currently from family. I’ve always sailed the seas even when subbed to Hulu, but once D+ starts blocking sub sharing I’ll be shoving off for the long foreseeable future once again.