• @fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1462 years ago

    A Google spokesperson told Motherboard in a statement at the time of the unionization that it had “no objection to these Cognizant workers electing to form a union,” but that it would not bargain with them. “We are not a joint employer as we simply do not control their employment terms or working conditions—this matter is between the workers and their employer, Cognizant,” the spokesperson said.

    NLRB seems to disagree. This will be an interesting case, I suspect …

    • plz1
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1372 years ago

      So Google, like Amazon, is trying to play the “they work for a subcontractor that only supports us, so it’s their fault, not ours” card. I really want to see the NLRB smack this pattern down hard and set an example for all the other companies to try to avoid unionization by way of not directly hiring people.

      • CheezyWeezle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        702 years ago

        NLRB changed their criteria for what is considered co-employment last month, widely broadening the definitions used to determine this status. Essentially, if a company has significant control (not just exclusive control) over any of a worker’s employment status or conditions, then they are considered a co-employer now. It used to be that a company needed exclusive or overriding control over another company’s employees to be considered a co-employer.

        I’m certain we are going to see more lawsuits and legal challenges from employees because of this. I’m pretty certain there already are lawsuits from some other Google contractors over this exact thing; they are providing a case that Google is their co-employer due to the control they have over every aspect of their work.

        • plz1
          link
          fedilink
          English
          252 years ago

          That’s excellent news, especially for the employees of Amazon subcontractors handling warehouse and delivery operations.

  • @negativeyoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    962 years ago

    I’m very much pro-union, but meanwhile artists and creators who made that content in the first place are getting fucked by everyone

    • ivanafterall
      link
      fedilink
      662 years ago

      A YouTube creators’ strike isn’t an impossible notion. It’d just have to be led by a couple of big names, like a Mr. Beast type.

      • @3laws@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        452 years ago

        Mr Beast is the result of the trendy gen Z libertarian millionaire pipeline. He will never unionize nor support strikes.

        • @psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          They could argue for

          • a greater share of the value
          • more certainty about being allowed to stay on the platform

          Pretty much like anyone’s top two asks. More money, more security.

        • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          No, it is not all upside. What has more value. Content people want to watch somehow. Or an empty “platform” that slurps up most of the gains.

          I’m not saying there is no value inherent to platform’s. Merely pointing out the disingenuous nature of that argument.

            • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              An empty platform has little value. Hundreds have gotten shut down for this very reason.

              Content by and large makes the platform. Not the other way round. Yet the platform soaks up the lions share of the benefit. Leaving most who aren’t whales to see nothing at all. This is the problem google is very complicit with. I’m all for them making enough to sustain the service. I just think they owe far more than they are giving, to the content that made them.

              Nebula is great. And is trundling along just fine. It could use some more promotion and love sure. But it’s goals aren’t the same as a behemoth like Google’s. Who’s talents aren’t in creating content, but promoting it.

                • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Creators would exist without the platform. They always have. But the platform definitely does bring value. The problem is that for a while now, greedy corporations have slowly been pushing the balance so that they received most of the benefit of everyone else’s work. It’s an overarching problem of capitalism that we need to deal with. But have been putting off for 50 to 60 years.

        • @pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 years ago

          Going with what is happening in the SAG/AFTRA strike, perhaps the big names shouldn’t join the strike because they would come across as entitled, but they are more than welcome to donate towards the strike.

    • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      Artists, techies, and socialists need to come together. To build a platform focused on sustainability ultimately. Devoid of profit for the sake of profit. And more focused on meeting the needs of their members. No overpriced CEO or board of directors. Or layers of redundant management. Once the service costs are covered. Anything after that could be split somewhat proportionally within strict limits.

        • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          A lot of the basic pieces are in place. Torrenting/peer tube for distribution. Modern day royalty free codecs. Realistically the two biggest hurdles are how to monetize responsibly, and bringing people in. It’s something that in one shape or form will always require some small donation of time and resources. And it’s easier to convince someone to join a Ponzi scheme telling them you will make them wealthy. Than it is to get someone to join guaranteeing that you’ll never make them wealthy but you will try to make them secure in their lives.

    • @foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      This is a good thread and good comment to throw this up on:

      https://youtu.be/PJSTFzhs1O4?si=3SalhKn7wN6dgUpP

      Benn Jordan, perhaps better known as “The Flashbulb” as an EDM artist, has an excellent YouTube channel. This video dives into some details on how we could get artists paid, and stop getting our art jerked around by corporations. For less than we pay to not get free healthcare healthcare, you could have access to all copyright content, ad free, and artists would be better compensated.

      It’s an idea worth spreading.

  • @ilex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    892 years ago

    The article became increasingly redundant as it continued. The crux seems to be Google isn’t their employer. These workers work for a subcontractor, Cognizant. Cognizant performs services for YouTube Music.

    Cognizant is refusing to bargain citing the ongoing relevant litigation* between its employees and Google.

    • I’m not sure what the legal process is called for union claims.

    Some of the employees are striking for 1 day.

    • @hobovision@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      592 years ago

      It’s redundant because there’s basically a circular argument that G and C are using to not respond to the workers. Workers want to C negotiate with G on the terms of their work with G but C says they can’t because they’re just contracting with G. Then G says the workers can’t negotiate with G because they work for C. Both companies point the finger at the other as to why they can’t help and just give nothing back to the workers.

      • @newDayRocks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        The article is confusing but it sounds like the union wants both C and G at the table, but C and G both agree that C should be the employer and G doesn’t need to join the talks. So C is saying, if you really want G to join, you’ll have to wait until the appeals are finished.

        I’m guessing the union doesn’t want to negotiate with C, have C go to G with the terms and G refuse and just causing endless delays in a game of telephone bargaining.

    • @Aurix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      One idea of subcontractors is to split and delegate societal responsibility to others to appear to be clean. Surely the law is focused on Cognizant here, but the responsibility lies fully on Google, including their ability to intervene.

      • @Sendbeer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        342 years ago

        Yeah, if you do a fair amount of YouTube and want to support the creators without queuing up a bunch of ads it’s a pretty good deal.

    • @ShortFuse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 years ago

      6 family members for $15 a month and no YouTube ads. Also that money was basically paid for by Google Rewards. The Web App is good too. I don’t have to deal with CEF/Electron or any install really.

        • @ShortFuse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yeah, sorry that was bumped up recently though I was grandfathered for a long while. But that was the impetus for getting it back when it was just GPM.

          It’s 6 actually (1+ 5 other members). My uncle basically paid for half of it.

          It’s $22.99 for me now which includes YouTube Premium. Just YouTube Music (for 6) is $16.99. Individual $10.99 and Student $5.49.

    • @WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      I don’t use YouTube Music but I love using YouTube for my music. Tons of songs on there that just aren’t on either YouTube music or other services like Spotify.

      • @Xey@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        You can listen to just the music that’s on YouTube via YouTube music. That’s one of the main reasons why I’m using YouTube music.

        • @jayandp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Yeah. You can search for and add any YouTube video to a playlist for YMusic. I do this all the time with various Indies, remixes, and foreign artists that are hard to find otherwise.

        • @JiraiyaIsNoLyah@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yeah, I switced to YouTube music when Google Play music went away because that’s where I stored all of my music at. But The category is massive, especially for niche songs and you can choose to watch the video or just listen to the song, Also with a lot of the songs you can look at the lyrics in real time while the music’s playing and that’s kind of nice. Also ad free YT is nice.

        • @WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Did they change it? The last time I tried it said a bunch of my songs weren’t available on YouTube music and I couldn’t use it cause of that.

    • Simple Jack
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      Totally. I was already in the ecosystem so it was only natural I go to Music when it was available. Is it better than Spotify? Shrug. Just different.

      • @ilex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Spotify has invested significant $$ in upgrading their platform.

        YTM lets you access user-uploaded content. With that comes more in the way of remixes and Indy artists. The platform itself is pretty dogshit, though.

    • Dawn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      For me, every other music app is missing alot of the songs I want to listen to (Cover songs, and remixes are the big 2) and they are only available on yt music.

      • @jayandp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Same + foreign artists. Lots of J-Rock artists that are hard to find on Western music services, let alone other countries. Only stuff like K-Pop I can find consistently on Western music services just because of how in demand it is.

      • @ilex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Soundcloud might be an alternative worth looking into. For the music I tend to search for, I find I’m more likely to find it on Soundcloud, and it can take years to migrate from SC to YTM.

        While YTM and SC were both $10, putting up with the worse platform was a reasonable price for no YT ads. Now that the grandfathering is ending and the price is jumping to $14, for US folks, I’m feeling the pressure to migrate.

    • 👁️👄👁️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Yeah, I just don’t pay for it lmao. Apps like InnerTune are great, rips them as mp3s and can use YouTube music radio system and lyrics.

    • Alien Nathan Edward
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Revanced, yeah. Still sucks when you’re looking for an album and all of the songs are from the official channel except for one that some schlub uploaded which repeats the previous track as an intro, has the levels maxed across all channels and sounds like it was recorded with a USB lapel mic in a paper bag

    • @Fisch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      A lot of FOSS music streaming apps (like ViMusic) use YT Music because you can access it for free. Doesn’t make them any tho.

    • @Companion1666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      YouTube Premium is so cheap, man. ₱159 (close to $3) per month. I gave up and exported my Spotify data for YouTube.

    • @dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Ever since Google destroyed Google Music i switched to Spotifly because at the time YouTube music couldn’t tell the difference between memes and music plus alot of my playlist was unavailable

  • @moriarty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    382 years ago

    A Cognizant spokesperson told Motherboard in an email, “We have received the Alphabet Workers Union’s request for a Cognizant bargaining representative. The request put forward was for both Cognizant and Google to bargain. While we respect our associates’ rights to unionize, we firmly believe Cognizant is the sole employer of our associates. While the joint employer ruling remains unresolved, we cannot bargain at this time.”

    “Google refuses to just admit that they are our employer, and then Cognizant is just using Google’s legal appeals as a scapegoat,” Marschner said. “That, honestly, is exactly why we filed for joint employer status in the first place. We knew that if we just tried to engage in collective bargaining with Cognizant, that’s exactly what they would do.”

    wut

    • Yeather
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Google has a shell company, Cognizant, that hires and subcontracts people to Google. When the workers unionize, they’re unionizing against cognizant, not Google. The workers are trying to say otherwise, will more than likely need a court case to sort it out.

      • @0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        302 years ago

        Cognizant is very much NOT a Google shell company, they are a third-party contractor with business in healthcare, tech, energy, insurance, education, etc.

        • Yeather
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          My bad, I was thinking of Amazon and their delivery “companies”

      • @seiryth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        This isn’t right. Cognizant are a well known systems integrator. In Australia alone recently they bought out some of the best local SIs just to get presence - contino and Servian, with a rumoured third (versent) on the way…

        Theyre a body shop looking to grow their born in the cloud generstion of engineers.

  • Willard Herman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    Time to stop using Gmail and YouTube. I had already avoided go░gle search for months now.

    Over the last three or four months I had deleted all my FaceBook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram accounts. And this made me want to avoid go░gle search.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      DuckDuckGo is fine for some things, but if you want to do a search with a specific phrase in quotes, it doesn’t recognize it. I hate having to go back to Google for some searches, but sometimes it’s just better. I wish it wasn’t, but it is.

      DuckDuckGo’s image search also leaves a lot to be desired.

      • @PurplePropagule@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I use duckduckgo but just throw in the google bang if I need specific functionality. Usually DDG is fine for me usually but it’s convenient to be able to switch quickly.

      • @dangblingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -32 years ago

        You don’t need to do the quote thing in DDG. You can literally just search the quote, and maybe the domain it was hosted on. You will find what you’re looking for. DDG even has business profile widgets like google search does. I don’t even miss google search at all.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I don’t think you understand what I’m talking about. I’m talking about a search phrase that is partially in quotes for an exact match and partially not for an inexact match. Google handles that, DDG does not.

        • @madprocessor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          DDG is my default and a very good engine, however, it does struggle with search results in my native language.

        • asudox
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          You should. It uses Bing for its searches. So you are censored to oblivion.

          • @dangblingus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            What’s being censored? You have control over safesearch, and searching phrases verbatim returns all sites where that phrase exists.

            • asudox
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Safesearch (NSFW) Censorship (Political, Government Posts, etc.)

          • @601error@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            Gonna need to see a legit source on that that doesn’t read like right-wing nutjobbery or Russian botnik drivel.

    • @dangblingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Start your own email server!! Download all of your favorite channels! Sub to your fav youtubers patreons! If you need music, use Spotify until you amass a collection of digital/physical music! Use FireFox! Google does not need to have any grip on our digital lifestyles.

  • @Shadywack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    I get the technicality of all this, but this could be a watershed moment. Businesses like to contract people out to move liability and cut corners in their obligations to the workers. The bottom line is that its cheaper and easier to fire whatever contractors you don’t like for any reason, and artificially push their salaries/wages down.

    Look at Fedex Ground, Amazon drivers, etc. Google is now firmly in the role of the bad guy here, with Sundar Pichai making 220+ million dollars with much of it on the backs of layoffs and ethnically bankrupt business practices. I honestly think the ramifications of this in a positive way for the workers is tantamount to the formation of the UAW itself with their sitting strikes. They sat at the machines and forcibly halted production.

    That needs to happen here, and all you scabs, fuck you. You can just piss off.

  • @greavous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    I can’t believe I’m saying it but but I’m with Google here. They are sub-cons so negotiation would surely go through their employer who is cognizant. I’m a sub-contractor, I’m not gonna go to the client and ask for a raise, I’m gonna go to my employer. Maybe it’s different in different regions but if I asked the client for a raise in the uk they would probably just laugh at me.

    • @ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Outsourcing in Europe is heavily scrutinised and regulated due to companies kept choosing to depend on third party agencies do they don’t have to do with strikes and unions.

    • @Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -52 years ago

      You are 100% correct, so it is especially funny seeing that almost 1/4 of the people downvoted you for no good reason. Holy fuck this site has a huge percentage of utterly clueless Lemmings.

  • @expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    could they put bring the dislike count back on the demands? and make so video posters can’t delete comments, so we can call bullshit when needed? that would be nice

    • BigDaddySlim
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      No they have bigger priorities, like retroactively demonitizing and removing videos that used to be just fine under the new ruse of “making everything more kid friendly” when we all know it’s to make it more advertiser friendly

      • Brudder Aaron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        If only there were an app… suited for kids that google could use… One that would give them the limitations and safety they want from people and not ruin the whole site while still chasing those kid viewers.

        If only such a thing existed.

    • @Neve8028@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      make so video posters can’t delete comments

      That would be a complete trainwreck. There are already loads of spam accounts but it would be so much worse if creators couldn’t filter them out.

  • @chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    Yea, no…the headline is wrong on this one. These guys are contractors. Google will just nuke Cognizant’s contract and call it a day.

    Those guys aren’t particularly good in my experience and are just warm bodies to do things that should be automated anyway.

    Google will simply go to another big contract firm and call it a day.

    • @dana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 years ago

      The NLRB ruled that the nature of their work makes them employees of both Cognizant and Google, despite whatever those companies try to classify them as, and that both are required to negotiate with the union. Google is now just flat-out refusing to respect that decision.

    • @Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      I was a “contractor” for JnJ. Which ok, is a different company but it’s the same premise. The reason they contract the work out is so they can avoid giving benefits and cut costs for an essential job. All so when something like this happens they can just pass the buck off to the contracting company saying it’s not their responsibility for the working conditions they set.

    • @A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m so glad bootlickers like you enjoy the taste of shoe leather. It makes the working class so much more unified.