• @SwampYankee@mander.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    125
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Screenshot of what’s happening for the uninitiated. Bot keeps posting YouTube links and then replying to itself because it detects a YouTube link.

    • @sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      Someone needs to make a PR to add a check for the username of the commenter that they’re replying to. Should be a simple conditional check.

      • @saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I can’t imagine anyone that concerned about privacy is so unprepared and unknowledgable online that they need the internet to cater privacy alternatives for them.

        “I dOn’T wAnT mY dAtA aLL oUt ThErE!!!”

        “Totally understandable. So what steps are you taking?”

        “PeOpLe HaVe tO dO iT FoR mE!!”

        So now we all must suffer?

        • The downside of being concerned about privacy is that it can be very inconvenient. I don’t think its so awful to try to minimize that, making it more accessible to people that wouldn’t otherwise bother.

  • @Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    I blocked that bot long ago. I don’t want to see a website being advertised on every video link on every Lemmy instance.

    • @FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      382 years ago

      I don’t see it as an advertisement. It’s the same as e.g. the AMPutator bot - it provides a convenient way to circumvent Google’s monopoly.

      • @Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        I guess it would feel less intrusive if it weren’t four spaced out lines where most comments are one.

        Regardless, even if it’s for a good cause, it is an advertisement. It’s informing users of Piped for the purpose of getting them to use it. Existing Piped users already have a convenient way to set up redirects, which have been posted several times.

        I guess it seems a lot nicer to people who actually want to use the service, but to people who don’t, it’s just advertising.

  • @smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    Invidious, Piped, etc. instances come and go. We shouldn’t link to them and break links.

    let’s just install LibRedirect or Privacy Redirect extention and just pick our own.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      If I could get either LibRedirect or Privacy Redirect in my Firefox based mobile browser I totally would. I’m just not 100% sure whether or not the feature from Firefox Beta allowing for using collections of desktop extensions- if the extension you want even works on mobile- has come to normal Firefox for android yet.

    • @Gamey@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      As far as I can tell that’s another way to link to piped.kavin.rocks aka not any instance but rather the official one, I highly doubt that will go away…