Recently the US Department of State has issued a condemnation of mass unrest acts in the Solomon Islands.
The United States side expressed its deep concern about ongoing clashes between law enforcement representatives and protesters in the Solomon Islands’ capital, Honiara. Participants of these clashes were called on to stop acts of destruction of public and private property and to start constructive dialogue, with the aim of an early settlement of the crisis.
The USA referred to the fact that New Zealand and Fiji supported this approach. Special appreciation was expressed to Australia and Papua New Guinea for assisting local authorities to ensure order and security for key infrastructure. It was particularly emphasized that the Solomon Islands’ Government had to seek help from Canberra and Port Moresby (they sent their police and military units there).
It is notable that riots in this Pacific State are interpreted by many in the media through the prism of anti-Chinese sentiment. Majority of the protesters have come to Honiara from Malaita Island, whose leadership is actively criticizing the central Government for large-scale corruption, speaking against the process of moving closer to China and condemning rupture of diplomatic relations with Taipei. It needs to be said that rather vicious anti-Chinese rhetoric is striking. Meanwhile, many experts have noted that the USA is behind all this turbulence. And many have been open in saying that this region becomes one of the places where the United States side is taking steps to limit the spread of China’s influence. We have to say that Washington rather cleverly uses every ounce of its political leverage to hurt Beijing.
Many proponents of convergence with Washington openly declare that the current pandemic has impeded the realization of economic projects, which China promised to implement in the Pacific Islands region. This, in turn, exacerbates social tensions in the country. Some even openly declare China’s credibility, its inability to follow through on own pledges and declarations when things get too intense.
Thus, it seems that Washington is gradually beating Beijing in the region.
Why the manifesto and no sources? You constantly say many, but… looks around and sees no one
A source would be appreciated.
many experts have noted that the USA is behind all this turbulence. […] Many proponents of convergence with Washington openly declare […] China’s credibility, its inability to follow through on own pledges and declarations when things get too intense.
There it is, USA agenda summarised. They are simply global fascists and do not want a democracy of hegemons.
What sources? There are no sources here. Just boxes with three dots in them? Am I missing something, or are you being facetious?
The boxes with 3 dots mean a coherent continuation of sentences or quotings. This is a very common grammatical usage in discussions when you want to avoid quoting irrelevant context amongst paragraphs of text to express what someone wanted to say in lesser words.
You want sources for what? Anglosphere since Renaissance has fought tooth and nail to retain the Anglo supremacy across the world. Britain had an entire Commonwealth empire, and post WW2, USA was passed the baton and now they have an empire with basecamps stationed around the world.
The boxes with 3 dots mean a coherent continuation of sentences or quotings. This is a very common grammatical usage in discussions when you want to avoid quoting irrelevant context amongst paragraphs of text to express what someone wanted to say in lesser words.
Thank you for explaining, I did not know this.
You want sources for what? Anglosphere since Renaissance has fought tooth and nail to retain the Anglo supremacy across the world. Britain had an entire Commonwealth empire, and post WW2, USA was passed the baton and now they have an empire with basecamps stationed around the world.
I tend to ask for sources when I can tell someone is responding out of emotion.
I do not speak too much emotionally, unless it is an informal chat with someone I have known for a long time. Public comments, unless they are meant for meme or comedy purposes, should be responsibly made as you do not know how many people stalk and create a record out of your statements. I have a lot of internet enemies :p
Oh trust me I remember! There was that account that was spoofing you.
Why would anyone want any hegemon at all? No to China No to US No to any other world power
Because apparently the world is not some kind of singularity communist or anarchist utopia. Realism is what dictates the workings, not idealism. Idealism is only meant for revolutions.
