• Taasz/Woof@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I can understand a lightweight IoT network to monitor temperatures and get alarms automatically. But why on earth would it allow controlling the fridge remotely?

    • Damage@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s fucking stupid, you don’t use the manufacturer’s systems for that, or you’ll need one system for the fridges, one for the ovens, one for the lighting… You’re supposed to connect them all to YOUR control system, over isolated VLAN/LANs and then secure your system only.

      • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Control systems will have to be air gapped going forward. This IOT fetish that the MBAs had is going to come back and bite a bunch of products in the ass.

        • Damage@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Control systems need to be gated behind a properly secured SCADA server, then you can monitor whatever you want by connecting to your company’s VPN.

    • fubarx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You need that if you want to let managers remotely control settings via mobile apps.

      Next time, the manufacturer will learn to use a local-only protocol like Matter.