• betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    The US and its O&G and car industries absolutely let China become the main manufacturer of batteries and EVs.

    Like Exxon, the US knew electrification was the future because of climate change, but tried to dismiss it. China seized the opportunity like a true capitalist, while the US government interefered with the free market to hinder electrification. This has been going on for over 20 years now.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The only possible achievable competition goal for US in AI is in building skynet. Boiling the oceans to obtain pure fascist oligarchist supremacy over Americans and pro Israel opinion in the world, far more than military targetting or weapons production supremacy advantages.

    There is zero chance long term of having the power infrastructure to support AI/datacenters in the US, and zero chance of extending AI into manufacturing dominance. China’s manufacturing supply chain, and abundance instead of tariff scarcity, makes it impossible for them to lose their edge to anyone unfriendly to China. Models that are less than 2 months, and closing, behind, and massive south east asia datacenter development that provides 90% of local frontier US model traffic consumed in China, makes US Oligarchism’s national security pretense a farce.

    US is collapsing late stage nazi colonial economy, and geopolitical AI is not even the last bastion to put all eggs in a basket for, it is a direct tool to pillage the US/colonies for oligarchy during accelerated collapse.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Invest in academia, get the best new tech.

    This is not surprising - the west has some serious university investment to do if it wants to catch up!

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That is actually good news. World shouldn’t be 100% dependent on US technology. I want alternative. So go China, go Japan, go EU, go Canada.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The US is busy figuring out how to charge a monthly subscription for an AI that summarizes emails. China is making the batteries, solar panels, and drones everyone actually needs. At some point Silicon Valley will announce a breakthrough: a chatbot that explains why manufacturing moved overseas.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The US has not only put all their eggs in one basket, they’ve taken out loans against the eggs that those chickens will lay once they’re hatched.

  • PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Don’t wanna sound like that guy, but this pretty much due to all the manufacturing capacity we shifted over to China. I mean they certainly got a jump start, yeah? It doesn’t hurt that the whole place is a building machine…wonder where they’d be if we never moved all that manufacturing there to begin with…

    • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 hours ago

      China has 1 billion more people than the US. And they’re graduating PhDs in STEM at twice the rate.

      Frankly, if you don’t expect them to surpass the US in the coming decades, you’d have to be delusional, the numbers bare it out. A billion more people.

    • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Absolutely, outsourcing manufacturing gave China a massive head start. But the West also outsourced decades of expertise, supply chains, and industrial know how while congratulating itself on becoming a service economy. China didn’t just inherit factories: it invested, learned, innovated, and built an industrial ecosystem. We handed them the starting line, not the finish line.

      • disorderly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s worse than most realize. When I went to Guangdong 10 years ago, I expected to meet fabricators and technicians making our products, but I instead met engineers probing our customers and capabilities.

        That company has since been acquired for pennies on the dollar by Google, to the surprise of no one.

        • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 hours ago

          And the irony is that China has moved far beyond copying Western technology. It’s now a global leader in research output, including fundamental research in materials science, chemistry, and physics. The West outsourced manufacturing, underestimated the transfer of expertise, and somehow assumed China would remain the world’s assembly line forever. That assumption aged spectacularly badly.

          • sunnie@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Which is extra ridiculous after having just gone through the same thing with (much smaller) Japan only a couple of decades prior and having domestic auto, heavy and precision machinery markets trounced.

            Once they see a few dollar signs in the short term, all long term vision becomes blind.