• Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is this insane amount of investment in AI built around LLMs that threatens the entire world. People worry about the bubble bursting but think AI is the ant’s pants without considering that the LLM is a dead end. None of the AI companies are going to achieve Artificial Intelligence. That’s why they will actually implode, their systems aren’t intelligent.

    • TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      well, they are being trained my the management, and as we all know these types wan’t 150% of the benefit with 25% of the work.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, they are artificial intelligence by pretty much any normal definition of that term. So is Battle Chess from the 1980s. So is bank fraud detection. So is Conway’s Game of Life in its most basic definition.

      Will they develop “super intelligence”, etc? No

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It wont be a real AI, but itll be just enough to kill off a lot of the software industry.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          Real ai to me would mean true agency. And an entity which has its own goals and relationship to its world.

          • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah. I wonder if it might be difficult to identify something that reaches that point? I suppose genuine creativity might be an indication of intelligence? Or a desire to reprogram itself? I dunno, I’ve recently read Peter Watts blindsight and it kind of made me reconsider the relationship between consciousness and intelligence.

        • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          A true Turing Machine, obviously

          One that when given input will give the correct output, every time, without fault or stalling, in a timeframe that is quick

          • HereIAm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            A Turing machine has nothing to do with AI. Pretty much any computer today can emulate one, the only thing lacking is infinite memory.

            • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Isn’t there a difference between Turing Complete and Turing Machine?

              I thought many machine can be Turing Complete (when given infinite resources, can give any required output), but a Turing Machine is one that is complete?

    • yuki_gassen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I fear that yes they are not good enough to actually replace labor, but good enough to cause unprecedented chaos. Under capitalism, at least.