• tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    They only care about engagement and growth. Damage to our social fabric, psychological disruption, hardening of positions, suppression of critical thought, encouraging anger … Fuck it!

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Facebook never cared about actual child abuse and sexual exploitation. why the hell would you expect them to give a fuck about AI generated child abuse.

  • FE80@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “Meta Is Refusing to Remove AI-Generated Facebook Videos of Graphic Child Abuse, Including a Baby Roasting in an Oven”

    The future fucking sucks.

  • Denfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Let me see if I have my pedo-billionaire glasses tinted correctly:

    School shootings are caused by violent video games, teenage depression, and propping doors open. But promoting Nazi-fascist ideology while posting videos that dehumanize others? All good!

  • Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Thank You, I was literally just about to open up Facebook for the first time in a couple of weeks. Then I saw this and didn’t, I remembered why I don’t use it any more.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Moderation is completely fucked. Tried reporting shit and nothing ever happens unless one is a business tycoon, a celebrity at the level of Taylor Swift, or a government affording to formally file a complaint.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 hours ago

    hint: is the baby roasting in oven video accompanied by a hasbara/description of “this is what hamas/palestinians do to Israeli babies”?

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m going to agree but also point out that this notion that Facebook is somehow the coalescence point for the world’s jackasses is totally delusional.

      The world is filled with morons, spend 5 minutes on any platform and you’ll see that.

      There is nothing special about the younger generation and the apps they use, they are just as fucking ignorant as the Facebook users. I mean really, spend a few minutes on any social media app and you are bombarded by the pointless thoughts of every jackass who’s ever felt they had some magic idea they just need to share.

  • Creegz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    When I still used Facebook would regularly report imitation sites and posts pretending to be national news outlets as impersonation and misinformation. They would never do anything about it. On Instagram I’ve reported openly hateful accounts calling for violence against groups, as their account name or bio and it doesn’t violate their TOS according to the responses I’m getting.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Take the normalized cruelty and punching down that most are brainwashed into, and give the apes ideas, sickness called freedom.

  • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Is a video of a baby roasting in an oven even illegal? In general, are videos of violent crime illegal?

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This. People reaaaaally don’t like that point, but video/fictional stuff should not be held to the same standard as actual, living people. Otherwise, we can kiss goodbye to 90% of the entertainment business. Movies, books, video games, pictures, all of those should be allowed to depict stuff, if only to criticize it.

      Unfortunately, too many people think that if they don’t want to see something, no media of it should exist.

      It would be very different if actual people were used, or even just their likeness, because then it actually can cause harm and distress. But this? People wasting their time defending pixels are doing only one thing: not defending actual people.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I don’t think that was the point of the comment you replied to.

        The point is that even if it was a real video, it’s not illegal. Just like a video of 9/11 is not a terrorist attack nor is it illegal, it’s just a video of one.

    • demonsword@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Try to make a video of Zuckerberg roasting and see how fast it will be taken down. Double standards much?

        • demonsword@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Despite my wording it doesn’t mean that you specifically should to produce such a video, it was more of a thought experiment. My take is that if such video were produced and published on any of Meta’s platforms it would remain very little time online, unlike the mentioned roasted baby video FTA.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Legality (or religion etc etc) doesn’t guide my morality, decency, or basic difference between right and wrong.

      • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What does guide your morality? I personally like the idea of virtue ethics, but so far I haven’t had time to properly familiarize myself with the concept. My understanding is that a virtue is a character trait that promotes human flourishing, and actions are good if they align virtues.

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      i think the point isn’t that they should have to take it down but that they should take it down. not taking it down is a choice.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No but it’s probably against their ToS so I don’t know why an AI generated gore video gets a pass.

      The only footage that’s illegal from what I understand are sexual assault videos (including obviously csam) and snuff films (which are different because they are specifically made for distribution and generating revenue compared to “accidental” gore films)

      Depends where you are as well and this is mostly from memory.

    • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      What? How? I mean… there are quite a lot of violent and graphic movies out there. So this should not be illegal. However, it has to be made sure that those videos cannot be seen by non-adults.

        • antianarchist@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Well, I know what you are trying to say, you just put it in a very extreme way. This is like saying that there are smokers who are 90yo, so it must be not affecting your health. A skewed view, because you don’t see the affected people, because they are six feet under. Same with traumatized people, who choose suicide because of all their experiences.