• whalesnrainbows@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    No one said they were being used by choice. The very reason behind their original purpose was precisely because people didn’t have anywhere else to live, not because they thought people would genuinely choose to live there over a normal home.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The whole premise of the meme is that we should be in awe how amazing commyblocks are, and how greatly they survive even to this days.
      The reality, that nobody disagrees with, is that post-war USSR very quickly built a bunch of cheap housing that was planned to be gradually replaced by a more nicely built ones, and a lot of them weren’t. This isn’t controversial, and not worth the meme. So the meme stretches this to mean something else.

      • whalesnrainbows@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The premise of the meme is that the problem of affordable housing could be very easily solved if the western world was willing to acknowledge that sometimes socialists have good ideas.

        This would not necessarily solve the problem of affordable quality housing, but it would be a very effective step in the right direction.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          First of all, no, it isn’t. Like, textually isn’t.
          Second, situation in post-war USSR is vastly different from the modern western countries. The problem isn’t lack of housing, it’s using housing as commodities. If you can create a system that can build millions of shitty crumbling concrete gravestones, you’d better use fraction of this system’s power to make laws that prevent commodification of housing, so it becomes affordable, and this will be the better outcome. And that’s also one of those good socialist ideas actually.
          But again, we’re not talking about the original point anymore.

          • whalesnrainbows@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            First of all, no, it isn’t. Like, textually isn’t.

            Then explain the “Liberals” part of the meme.

            The problem isn’t lack of housing, it’s using housing as commodities. If you can create a system that can build millions of shitty crumbling concrete gravestones, you’d better use fraction of this system’s power to make laws that prevent commodification of housing, so it becomes affordable, and this will be the better outcome.

            I agree