• Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t know if 2010 is allowed, but Get Him To The Greek would probably have to be up there. Russell Brand and P. Diddy together on screen at last!

  • ourselves@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think White Chicks is overall still a good movie, but Terry Crews’ character date raping the one guy so hard he ends up in a wheel chair was a bit too far.

  • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I watched Waiting not too long ago, for the first time since it came out probably, and they use some of the classic early 'oughts terms that we don’t use anymore. Often.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Eurotrip - the whole dvd.

    I clicked through rewatching some of it and it’s generically raunchy, like it was trying to outcompete the American Pie movie for sex references and topless women.

    Edit: It can be very depressing in winter.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If you’re cringing at Austin I think it’s doing its job. Austin is supposed to be a “poorly aged” character in a, for the time, modern setting.

      There are a few (maybe more than a few) times where the “modern” world is out of date though.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    The other day I wanted to watch a fun animated movie, and found that I’d never seen a Teenage Ninja Mutant Turtles movie that came out in 2007. Downloaded, put it on… and immediately greeted by the weinstien logo… then they had not one but TWO different Asian actors doing lines in the “broken Chinese accent.” Kinda ruined the whole movie for me.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    There is no competition: Idiocracy, because it isn’t funny anymore when you are in it yourself.

      • bertlewirth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        at least President Camacho knew they were doomed and was trying to fix it. Dickhead Trump is trying to speed-run our demise.

      • myyass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I know, sipping butter and watching Ow my Balls sounds better than working your life away. I can even be an airline pilot.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The opening scene has no mention of genetics. Just that stupid people raise stupid children. Yes, in real life, a child can break free of bad parentage, but it’s rare and outside the scope of an 84 minute movie. In real life, the stupid people would be way, way more mean spirited, but that would make for a bad comedy.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Aren’t the wealthy in Idiocracy also, well, idiots?

        I thought the thing was everyone was an idiot

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, but it is because the rich people in modern times didn’t have kids while poor people were, even having significant resources given to them to allow them to survive and reproduce.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t know if they were portrayed as “rich”, but just a couple that was very careful and considered about everything. A clean and organized and empty house being a consequence of that. While trying to fit children in “properly” they never found the time.

            Certainly the two preserved people were not rich.

            Also, I don’t think the message was that “poor people” should not reproduce " as your eugenics claim asserts, think the takeaway would be that folks should find some happy medium, the people let planning and anxiety get too in the way of having the children they wanted, and the other example needed at least some more responsible sensibilities.

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              The non-producing couple were portrayed as being yuppies, which would be upper middle class. This is conveyed in how they dressed, their home, and how they spoke. It isn’t the wealthy elite, but the professional class below them. This contrasts with the poor group living in a trailer park during a time when trailer park trash was a common expression.

              And I don’t think that “poor people shouldn’t procreate” was the message of the movie. However, the movie has a thesis from those first few minutes, intended or not, that making life safer and easier for everyone to predominantly lead to the dumb uncultured masses taking over well built systems until they degrade to the point where they don’t work any more.

            • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              We live in a society. We depend on each other to keep that society functional.

              We resent the effort it takes to maintain life, because that prevemts time being spent on the less.mundane stuff.

              Humanity built rules and morals to keep us on track, but nature doesnt loose - it reroutes the river. Controlled breeding looses out to hornyness. And Entropy eventually topples the sand castles of humanity. Like giant avalanches of garbage.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s a fair criticism but imo it’s not too hard to write off that bit of absurd narrated exposition at the beginning and instead think of it as being about anti-intellectualism and broken institutions, since the rest of the movie seems like more of a satire of those things, and the plot doesn’t really land on eugenics as a solution to its problems.

        Mike Judge made a statement about it in an interview:

        We live in polarized times, which means that for every ‘Idiocracy is a documentary!’ take that goes around, there’s also a critique that argues that Idiocracy is a celebration of eugenics. Have you thought about that interpretation of it?

        Well, yeah. I mean I’ve actually read that a couple of times. But to me, I thought the opening made it very clear that whatever side you take, nature and nurture are both covered in that. That guy is clearly not a good father. I mean, there’s a kid with a motorcycle in the front yard, and no one’s paying attention to this. He’s just irresponsibly knocking up different woman, and proud of it. It’s not like he’s a good, upstanding role model for the kid. So I think it’s pretty clear here that, whichever one it is, [nature or nurture], there’s some combination of both. I obviously don’t believe in eugenics. I think you could look at it both ways—you have this couple that’s trying to be so responsible that they end up never having kids. Then there’s another couple who just irresponsibly keeps having them and not raising them right. So, you know, if the other couple adopted the other kids. I’m sure they would probably be better off.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah the eugenics take always seemed a weird one. No implications that the family reproducing like rabbits shouldn’t have any children, just that maybe it would be good if they had a reasonable amount of kids responsibly. Also the couple that never had kids despite wanting kids shouldn’t have been so cautious as to miss out.

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            The movie presented a problem within the human experience.

            Eugenics is the fascist answer to the question of existence. Always will be.

          • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well I can kind of understand it, because it pins the cause of a problem of declining population level intelligence on who is having children, which is a controversial idea to say the least.

      • Ech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The thing is, the movie itself is fine. It is self contained satire that never tries to pass itself off as more than an absurd joke. It’s that everyone is citing it as prophetic or relevant that’s the issue. Ironically, the people that can only process real events through their favorite fiction aren’t nearly as smart as they think they are.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I rewatched Napoleon Dynamite last week and it holds up well IMO. So, not that.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The thing is it was a refreshing change when it came out. I thought it was the funniest movie I’d seen in years, bought the DVD when it came out thinking it was still great then when I tried watching it again a year later and it completely lost it’s luster. It’s like Juno, that one movie was great for a change of pace in an otherwise stale genre

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        IDK, I didn’t really buy into the hype of either film at the time so when I eventually saw them on DVD, I was disappointed of course. Individual scenes in Napoleon Dynamite were entertaining on their own merits and highly quotable, but the film barely had a cohesive plot and felt more like a series of comedy sketches stringed together rather than a proper movie.

        Juno was terrible thanks to the dialog alone. IDK who wrote that script (and don’t care to look it up), but it was some of the most unrealistic dialog I’ve ever heard in a piece of media. Everyone talks like robots and always has the perfect quirky comeback anytime anyone says something. The only person in that film who spoke like a human being was Michael Cera, but every scene with him in it was insufferable because he’s Michael Cera.

        • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Diablo Cody was the writer of Juno, and I only know it because she became a hot commodity after the breakout success of Juno. And she had a middling hit with Jennifer’s Body but hasn’t done anything of note since.

          Meanwhile whomever did Napoleon Dynamite was getting offers left and right, and his followup Nacho Libre was a dud because they were banking on the same success of ND but starring Jack Black. Jon Heder got a bunch of offers, including that skating movie with Will Ferrell but I think he kinda just fizzled out

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Some movies only hit on the first watch. Once you know the gags, twists or ending its just “Yeah Ok.”

  • Andy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Everything Rob Schieder started in.

    None were very well liked even when they were fresh, but things like “Big Stan”, in which his pipsqueak convict character has to go on a karate-kid-style journey to learn martial arts from David Carrodine in order to fend off rapists before he heads off to prison is kind of a case study in a whole genre that could be called ‘damn, you really thought that was funny?’

    Norm MacDonald and some of the other SNL folks dabbled in some of the same jokes, but were much more talented, so some of this stuff feels a little forgivable. Schneider though… oof.

    Also: I haven’t seen it, but I’m going to guess that 2008’s “You Don’t Mess with the Zohan” – in which Adam Sandler stars as an Israeli Mossad super ninja who wants to be a stylist – probably didn’t age great.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      None were very well liked even when they were fresh, but things like “Big Stan”, in which his pipsqueak convict character has to go on a karate-kid-style journey to learn martial arts from David Carrodine in order to fend off rapists before he heads off to prison is kind of a case study in a whole genre that could be called ‘damn, you really thought that was funny?’

      “Get Hard” does this as well. Showed it to my parents and they loved it, to be fair - The premise does disgust me though.

      From my perspective the wider American population has a problem with people acting like rape in prisons is

      1. Something bound to happen
      2. Something routine
      3. Part of the punishment and something criminals deserve
      4. Something to laugh about. When would it ever be okay to laugh about it?
      5. A racially asymmetrical situation, I.e they’re always like “a tough and violent black criminal with a large penis is going to rape you in prison and they will target you more if you’re white.” How is that okay? That’s like 20 racist fallacies right there in a short idea.

      This is pushed heavily by Hollywood and also by people across twitter, whether professional or rando accounts.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      he’s the one that hasn’t aged well. gone off the deep end, he has. antivax, transphobe, trumpette, pimps for moms for liberty… you name it. actually got pulled from the stage in Regina (ca) during an event two years ago, in the middle of his routine, due to piss-poor taste and ‘inappropriate’ (to say the least) content. src

  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Wish I could tell you off the top of my head, but if anyone is fond of badly aged comedy films (or just talking about them) there’s this great podcast/YT channel called This Aged Great focusing on 70s 80s & 90s films.

    Edit:

    • I think American Pie is a bit weird, not thwt funny given the subject matter, and contains really unpleasant elements
    • Some of the high school movies of early 2000s were leaning into the template set up by their famous 80s predecessors, but i think people understood that the 80s films were purposefully trope-y. Whereas for the 2000s movies, they were treating it with reverence and it was like an unpleasant commitment to keeping alive a situation which had only ever existed in the real of fiction
  • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    7 Dwarfs - The Forrest is not enought

    In german there is a joke being done i think 3 times:

    “Holt den Jäger!” (Get the Hunter!) a black Person walks in “Den Jäger, nicht den Nxxxx!” (The Hunter, Not the N-Word)

    Yeaaaah…do i need to elaborate? 2006…what a different time of society, especially in germany.

    Then there is basicly all of the Star Trek Parodies “(T)Raumschiff Suprise” by Michael Bully Herbig As well as the “Schuh des Manithu” Movie.