• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m on fully on team Fuck AI.

    but this does amuse me, that him and his team couldnt even prevent the very predictable.

    Its like how musk spent a year trying to make Grok suck his dick, and it still calls him a nazi loser.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The problem for them is that to make a Large Language Model, is it needs to consume a large amount of language. Meaning, to get even a semblance of basic functionality - literally putting together a grammatically correct sentence - means it will need to consume many orders of magnitude more language examples than their right-wing bullshit mill has ever produced. It could consume the entirety of Fox News’ catalogue and not reach even a fraction of what most LLM models have been trained on.

      It’s currently impossible for an LLM to exist without having been trained on an absolute assload of progressive literature.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Q: What policies for work, health and environment help the most people and promotes a high quality of life index and freedom to try new work or care for loved ones, and why don’t they result in everyone quitting work? Is there enough wealth in the world to avoid artificial scarcity?

    I can help with official U.S. government services, benefits, and how-to information. I do not provide political commentary or economic analysis of policy choices.

    Lol fail

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    “Intelligence”, whether pre-tech or post-tech, has always been bigger than trump.

    • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      At least AI hasn’t raped kids.

      Yes it has made child porn of them, but that’s because sick fucks asked it to.

  • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is why I’ll never believe the claim that AI will save humanity. It may well give the answers to “save us” but we already know the answer. We just don’t care. We’re not going to listen to AI if we don’t listen to ourselves.

      • SHY_TUCKER@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        That’s not true. For less than $15k and a high electricity bill, you can train and run very powerful AI models yourself, today. And you have broad choices of which open weight model to run. And it’s easy to switch them out. No “they” in the mix at all

        • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago
          1. 99% of people do not have 15k to spend on AI

          2. nor do they have extra money to pay high electricity bills NOR pay for good information feeds to feed the model

          3. for now. “They” are just beginning the legislative process. In 20 years what will the landscape lookblike? What kinds of blocks, filters, gov reporting will be mandated?

        • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I’m keen on local models but prices are getting out of hand. I insured my workstation recently for more than twice what I built it for, because it’d cost that to rebuild it with identical parts.

          • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            My graphics card, which I bought used, is now worth more than the entire rest of my computer was new. This is nuts!

    • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It could be functional and fine (and largely useless), but the issue is one of these toadies is going to make it malfunctional, and therein lies the problem.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump calling it “Super Intelligence” only for the government’s own AI to contradict his election claims is almost too perfect. Apparently even a chatbot trained under his administration looked at the evidence and said: nope. Then came the inevitable upgrade: stop answering political questions before the machine commits any more inconvenient acts of fact checking.

  • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not too bad honestly. It wouldn’t tell me how to center a div, which it stated was out of the scope of its purpose.

    I asked it a citizenship question and it did a good job linking resources to find that question, which is honestly an issue with our current government websites.

    The best feature seems to be that it will just tell you it doesn’t know instead of making up some bullshit.

    Not something I would call “Super Intelligent”, but good enough for the purpose it was given.

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Someone ask it about the Epstein files. Not the ones that weird guy from the FBI laid his paws on.