E: this baby dicked Honda owner is laughing at the responses.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    I feel like this point could be made without insulting her daughter’s future partner

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          That is what our patriarchy teaches us, is it not? That we must be providers and fertile to have value. It’s our role as men, no?

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Are you saying it’s a valid argument because it’s in agreement with the patriarchy? Saying “the patriarchy teaches this” isn’t exactly a very good argument for “so we should accept it as valid and true”…

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              I really thought… I really thought I loaded that statement with so much ridiculous bullshit that you guys would all understand that I was being satirical. And poes law got me again.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Satire doesn’t always convey over plaintext, as it lacks tone of voice, facial expression, and gesture. That’s why we have emojis and “/s” tags…

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        If the “joke” was about “flat-chested women who can’t cook” not being “special,” then suddenly you might be more reluctant to defend it as “humor”…

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Oh, totally. I’m not defending the joke. It’s mid. I’m just saying that removing the exaggerated extra commentary just makes it a statement.