• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    30 days ago

    In an argument recently a Zionist challenged me to name one thing about Israel that was similar to Nazi Germany and I said: The laws are different for Jews than for everyone else.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Genuinely despicable. Hopefully the courts will strike it down swiftly.

    This is most likely a Right-wing plot to drive division in the Left leading up to elections. Many parties end up polling below the threshold, so in a contentious election they often merge to form larger parties and mutually benefit. If Left wing parties can’t form common ground to merge, then the Right stands to gain more seats without having to win more votes.

    • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      What division in the left? Literally every “left” party is pro genocide in Israel.

      The actual leftists (communist party and the Arab parties) have a coalition that this apartheid law would break up.

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The word ‘apartheid’ has been thrown about a lot with Israel but it’s never quite been accurate as Palestine is another country.

    But this is Apartheid. There is no weaseling around it. It’s 100% apartheid. Israel, go fuck yourselves.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      It’s literally in the Israeli Constitution that all Jews and only Jews can be are Israeli Nationals (edit: all Jews are per the constitution Israeli nationals, which is why any Jew can just land on the Tel-Aviv airport and ask for and get Israeli nationality).

      Non-Jews in Israel can only be Non-Jewish Israeli Citizens which is something different in that country and has fewer rights than a national (for example, they have to apply if they want to move to live in some places and can be refused).

      So at its very core Israel is and has been from the start an Apartheid state.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I always took the term “apartheid state” to refer to the way Israel treats Palestinians both in the West Bank, which despite being a separate country is also under military occupation by Israel, and at home within Israeli borders

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Liberal zionists finding the trimming around the ceiling very interesting to look at right now.

    • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      30 days ago

      Banning opposition parties, yes. But banning ethnic groups - that’s the definition of apartheid and it’s literally the crux of the problem in Palestine.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    That sounds like a fantastic idea when the opposition is threatening to topple you, please continue

    Edit: Sarcasm, have you ever heard of it?

    • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      30 days ago

      You do know that the point of a democracy is that it’s up to the will of the people to decide who gets toppled politically, not for the party in charge to ban a party that may topple them, right?

      Not that an Arab party would topple any of the leading parties in Israel anyway, but the point still stands.

      • Peacepath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Not exactly… historically, democracy is a system where random citizen are called at power for a given time, and then face a trial where people may condemn them to death if they did shit (or claim they are heroes if they did good). At least that is how Athena’s democracy worked.

        The new democratic claim is that people choose a head, and then the head can do whatever without face any consequences. Choose your tyran.

        US, European countries, Soviet Union and North Korea aren’t really democratic systems, even if they claim so.