• CluckN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    My favorite ads are the ones that can easily be solved with minimal human interaction. Apple released an ad for their “rewind” feature where the Apple Watch records everyone’s audio and transcribes it. Their shining example is if the waitress talks too fast you can stare at your watch instead of asking her to repeat herself.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Ironically. When I was in the Nordics many moons ago and rang up the hostel with my beginner English to ask a question, the receptionist rattled off the answer at 300 words per minute, of which I understood about none. Upon me asking her to repeat, she did in fact repeat, at the same speed and with the same result. I thanked her, hung up the phone and to this day have no idea what she said.

      You know what people with hearing problems do actively use when they can, especially in their non-native languages? Subtitles.

  • Obituarykidney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    29 days ago

    I’ve been seeing ads made by ai and they’re even worse. Just saw one on YouTube for glasses “that change colour with just the touch of a finger!” And had ai video of smiling people at the beach tapping their lenses to change the glass colour multiple times, like the glass itself has rgb. Best part is, the fake product didn’t even work consistently in the ai video and didn’t change colour when they tapped sometimes.

    I genuinely don’t understand how an ad that’s so obviously fake is tricking enough people to be worth spending an entire ad budget on.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      Scams actually work better when they have obvious mistakes. It helps weed out people that might figure out the scam before they’ve handed over their money, saving the scammers time and effort and making the scam more efficient.

    • DrSoap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      They’re targeting a vulnerable population. Grifters are going to grift and things are easier than ever for them. If you make it too hard to return and most people keep your crap, especially if its $20 or less. It would be nice if they found grifts that didn’t clog up our landfills and thrift stores but I guess this is better than all the identity theft. I also can’t wait to see what this decades hot new MLM is. Its the selling courses on selling courses bs thats hot now.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        I really wish people would start buying this drek with credit cards and doing charge backs. Let’s see how long these fuckers last when they’re paying the cost of product, shipping, and card processing fees.

        Jk, I know the margins on this shit is massive

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Hey Gemini, can you email my boss and make it look like I did my job?

    Hey Gemini, text my wife

    Hey Gemini, can you justify my behaviour to my wife and explain why it’s wrong she’s mad at me?

    Hey Gemini, can you fake my resume and make me sound good for every job posting around me?

  • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    29 days ago

    I can write my own Grade 8 essays, thank you very much.

    One time I successfully used an AI to troubleshoot a sound driver problem in Linux. It was maybe a little faster than casting about on stack exchange. I had to prompt it like 30 times though because it kept being confidently wrong. I didn’t continue to use it.

    Maybe there are people out there who need something to suggest “sandwich”. You buy water from the water company because you wouldn’t have water without them. I would be embarrassed to shop from a company that claims to sell “intelligence”

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      I used Claude terminal and it immediately identified that i had a service that constantly sent small packets to my headset and since all packets have to use the smallest ones it was crackling sometimes due to latency

      Fized that and set the minimum to a reasonable amount

      It had its uses

  • MutantTailThing@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    There’s people still not using adblockers and they get ai generated ads about ai shoved down their throats. Why are you doing this to yourselves?

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    It might be they’re not trying anymore.

    All the common AI tasks that by end-users and small businesses can be done better by local software rather than through compute on a hyperscale platform. The only reason to need big AI is for large-scale projects. They’re still selling compute at a huge loss, and their profits are dwarfed by their expenses.

    (Some argue the expenses are due to the massive buildout, which is reaching a capability point of diminishing returns. But even the running expenses outweigh the profits, even with government contracts.)

    You know, like controlling armies of killer drones, or processing mass surveillance data to find dissidents that are an actual threat. Or doing cyber-ops on a rival nation.

    I think that is why the stock market is still investing in big AI, not because we want better slop, but because they want garrison large populations and wreck rival societies.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      29 days ago

      Only a fool would think AI data centers are to help Timmy with an essay, Gertrude decide on a gift for her grandkids or Cameron the moron write a professional response at work that doesn’t sound like it was written by 6th grader…

      …it’s all about mass surveillance. Always has been.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    29 days ago

    I’ve been seeing ChatGPT ads recently that, I think, are trying to position their AI as something old lonely people can talk to when they have nobody else in their lives. It’s really quite sad.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      29 days ago

      I’m old and alone, but there’s no fucking way I’m going to talk a machine. Because, then I’d be old, alone, AND pitiful.

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      29 days ago

      I heard a podcast (maybe This American Life) that spent time with a woman out in the sticks, physically no longer able to be active, all kids many hours away, who was given one of these by her local fire department. She had been scoring lower and lower on cognitive tests for several years, and after getting this thing she reversed that trend. It was creepy, and her kids didn’t like it, but it was there and her kids were not, and it clearly had improved her quality of life. It’s sad she didn’t have human connections in her daily life, but given her circumstances, the thing had upside.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Also sad is this is one of the few things ChatGPT would actually be good at. It’s basically what it was designed for.

  • cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    29 days ago

    Today’s children would wonder how their grandparents lived without cellphone. Tomorrows children are going to think how we get anything done without AI.

    • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      I could live without a cellphone. But since AI got popular, it isn’t as easy to keep up at some subjects as it was before (since everybody at our highschool cheated with AI - at least I did most of the non-annoying stuff myself), which means I had to do more work.

      • 5318008@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        Factually, using AI in your education means you get less value out of that education. In every math class ever, you’ve probably heard some version of,

        “I don’t care that you got the right answer. I already know that 2x^2 - 5x -3 factors into (2x + 1)(x - 3) and I already know that this information is freely available. What I care about is making sure that you can figure that out without anyone helping you.”

        If you use AI to do a problem, you’re training your ability to do something that everyone else on the planet can do. If you force yourself to do it, you’re training your ability to actually think.

        You actually WON’T have to do more work in the long run. Think of it as an investment. If you spend the time learning it now, properly, so that you actually understand it, then every test that your study for, for the rest of your life, will be easier, and you’ll get higher grades. Measurably.

        https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/your-brain-on-chatgpt/

        https://www.media.mit.edu/articles/ai-s-impact-on-cognitive-ability-mit-study-reveals-more-troubling-data/

        Keep it up.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        That work is way more valuable than an empty grade. You are going to have very useful advantages over the ones using chatbots to cheat.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    There was some AI ad where someone pointed their camera to their messy shelf and were like “Hey, how do I clean up my shelf?” and the AI was like “try rearranging the smaller items first” and about a billion people went “no shit”.

  • theparadox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Meanwhile I ask Gemini “Hey Gemini, can this Google product do X?”

    It responds "Here is a list of features for Google’s Product:
    … Does W! Does X! Does Y! …

    Me: clicks source for listed feature X… gets sent to post on Product’s support forum: “Can Product do X?” “No, it can’t do X.”

    Thanks Gemini!