cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/52022727

Looks like everyone who raised awareness about “Mark Zuckerberg Pervert Glasses” ultimately made a real difference <3

    • trevor (any/all) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would also expect them to try leaving a mic in there too so they can continue being perverts, just less obviously.

      Edit: yep, sick fucks:

      The camera-free glasses, code-named Luna, will still feature an array of six microphones to allow users to speak to the company’s AI chatbot and its recently-released AI assistant, called Muse. They’ll presumably pick up audio from users’ environments as well, where bystanders may not be aware of the eavesdropping.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    It won’t be enough to just remove the cameras and quietly sell them. They’re gonna need to somehow make it very clear there is no camera. Through both an ad campaign and by the styling of the glasses. If they don’t, no one will trust them, or the people wearing them. But, I suspect they’ll try, because it’s shameful to publicly admit fucking up so badly. And, billionaires aren’t good at accepting shame.

    • iByteABit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If someone is wearing glasses made by Meta and aren’t being held at gunpoint for it, I don’t trust them camera or no camera

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      There was a dude 3D printing brightly coloured clip ons to cover the camera. Not a bad idea.

      Still not touching that shit until someone comes out with one with zero cloud connectivity

      • Mnem667@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe it’s still too early and my coffee hasn’t fully kicked in, but what could be done with these without cloud connectivity? I assume the hardware is severely limited due to power requirements and size limitations.

        • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I could imagine some uses for non-connected smart glasses. Mechanics who may want to refer to schematics as they work with both hands, without having to disengage and paw through paper or look it up on a laptop? Ppl with various disabilities, run a cheap algorithm to give acoustic cues to blind people?

          Prob is, there’s no visual way to know if the devices are cloud connected and spying for FB, or not. And even if not, if they’re storing pics locally that will later get sent to a big tech co.

          I miss the pre-IOT days TBH.

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          My phone is wicked smaht as they say. It can easily run detection algorithms fully locally. It already knows peoples faces I’ve tagged in my photos, where I am, what’s my agenda etc.

          All the glasses need to do is interface with the phone for all tasks they can’t manage internally.

          A smartwatch, but as glasses if you will.

          Also if I do want any internet/cloud access, I trust my phone to do that in a way I prefer instead of just giving everything to Zuck’s ad machine.