• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s the energy crisis. They realized “oh shit money is real now” and are trying to sooth investors.

    Interested how Monday will go. This is not what investors want to hear, even if it’s softened by markets being closed.

        • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The nature of a bubble means that the longer you go the more likely it actually is. And this is a bubble I frankly can’t wait to pop.

          Significant portions of Lemmy are turning into debate bro bro hreads on AI and its relevance.

        • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I heard on the Framework subreddit that they just secured a cheaper batch of RAM and refunded their customers, so could be something or maybe it’s just a blip. I’m also wondering if the recent Flash model releases are disrupting investor interest in the AI datacenter projects especially since running them on local hardware is starting to become more feasible, and for businesses in particular possibly more cost-effective.

          • criscodisco@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            55 minutes ago

            “AI” seems to be best put to use performing specific automated tasks. This is something a lot of us have been saying for a while now, but they tried to make what is essentially an industrial tool (as in boutique AI for specific industries), into both slide deck candy for enterprise C-suites, and an expensive consumer plaything. Enterprise customers demand real results for their money, and consumers do not care about the novelty of generative AI enough to recoup the costs of this insane level of infrastructure development. Add what is essentially shaping up to be runaway inflation, and well, yeah. No one cares about this shit.

            They came at it like this because they are Silicon Valley and for the better part of 3 decades now, they have operated under the assumption that they are always right, and that if they can survive running on a loss at first, eventually they will acheive market dominance and monopolize their product. I just don’t see it happening. I see this more like the early dot com days. A lot of investment, and a lot of failures. But eventually, for better or worse, a few of them figured out how to make it work. This time around however, capitalism itself is failing.

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          The market can stay irrational for a long time but it does eventually have to happen. The 2008 crisis was the result of overleveraging in 1999-2003 and interest rate rises from 2004-2007, so it can take years for it to crumble. Two years is a long while but it could easily take two more before people realise the emperor has no clothes.

    • hash@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think it’s a combo of this and the fact that “intelligence” continues to not scale with the inputs as they’d hoped. I haven’t been keeping up with developments, but it feels like they’re finding new ways to discover that the brain is in fact an miraculously efficient and effective mechanism. Most their party tricks seem to be reproducing brains more minor processing feats in interesting ways. All the promised advancements have stagnated and what remains is just exploitation of economies of scale and its consequences, which is far from the revolution investors were promised.