I’ve had an organ donor card in my wallet for as long as I can remember and I’ve always made it very clear to my loved ones that I want all my organs to be used when I die.

My question is, given that I only need one kidney, would it be better if I were to donate the other one right away rather than after my inevitable demise?

Obviously, my organs won’t be used in the unlikely event that I die in some unrecoverable way, like being lost at sea or something. And there’s always the possibility that a close relative might need a kidney at some point, so I should arguably save it for them.

Is there some other reason to do it now?

  • @n0x0n@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    812 years ago

    You’ve got 2 kidneys. You generously give one to someone in need.

    You have 1 kidney. You now have a single point of failure, where you had redundancy before.

    IT guy here, just in case that might have gibt unnoticed.

      • @Klear@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        172 years ago

        If I ever end up in a coma with little hope of recovery, I want them to unplug me. And then plug me back again.

    • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      ah, but[1] if you donate a kidney you go to the top of the queue

      you’re losing one when you don’t need one, and receiving one when you do

      insurance salesman here[2], just in case that might have gibt unnoticed


      1. to the best of my knowledge ↩︎

      2. obviously not ↩︎

      • @Oaksey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        But it won’t be your own kidney and you will have to take drugs to try and stop your body rejecting it.

      • Halafax
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Source? When they proposed to do this for blood donors, it got shut down in a hurry.

      • Poplar?
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I’m guessing you didn’t manually insert those footnotes, how did you?

        • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          lemmy supports two footnote formats

          the basic type like so:

          comment body here[^1]
          
          [^1]: and the footnote at the very bottom of the comment
          

          or the easy to write type

          comment body here^[and the inline footnote]
          

          (note the different locations for the caret)

          keep in mind that they don’t work on most apps, and some frontends

    • @Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      You now have a single point of failure, where you had redundancy before.

      On the plus side, someone else gets to continue existing.

      Or from the IT perspective: I have two important servers, one has a single drive, the other has RAID mirroring. The drive in the first server fails. I could take a drive out of the server with RAID and have two functional servers or I could keep the second one running on its RAID and have a server with redundancy (that hopefully/might not be needed).

      (I’m not going out and donating a kidney though, guess we can say it’s because I’m selfish.)

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Unless you’re running RAID 0 (stripe), then you’d lose everything by pulling one of the drives.

      • @Archpawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Counterpoint: If you’re an IT guy, you’re probably making enough money that you can donate mosquito nets and save tons of lives, and it’s not worth risking all that to save one more.

      • @Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        But as OP points out, someone will get that kidney eventually anyway. So the difference is that a different someone else gets to continue existing.

        • @Kerfuffle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          But as OP points out, someone will get that kidney eventually anyway.

          OP erroneously thought that but it’s not actually correct. The conditions where someone dies but their kidney is viable for a transplant are rare.

  • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    I mean, I only get 65% normal function out of both kidneys pumping at full capacity so giving away one would likely put me down to 33% which is in the “you need dialysis every week if not more often” range. Don’t set yourself on fire just because you think you might help someone out for a few years.

  • @EntropicalVacation@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    A kidney donated from a living donor often lasts longer and performs better than a kidney from a deceased donor. Donating a kidney to a stranger can begin a paired donation chain that can result in several people getting kidneys. If you are seriously thinking about donating, I strongly encourage you to do some research with reputable sources, talk to some people who’ve donated themselves, talk it over with your loved ones, and maybe talk to some transplant coordinators at the nearest transplant center. It’s not something to be undertaken lightly, but living donors are saints.

    • @frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Thanks for the links! I wasn’t thinking about it all that seriously (this post is the first time I’ve mentioned it to anyone) but it’s interesting to know that it could do a lot more good than my previous plan of just… waiting till I die.