cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51634640

A new Gamers Nexus investigation found a retail LG TV actively scanning the local network for phones, laptops, smartwatches and other connected devices, while also capturing microphone audio when the screen appeared to be in standby. The investigation found voice data being stored locally even after the TV was disconnected from the network, with the queued data uploaded once connectivity returned. Researchers also uncovered webOS vulnerabilities that could potentially turn the television into a remotely controlled surveillance device. The really unsettling part isn’t just the advertising angle. It’s the fact that a consumer television can sit inside your trusted network, enumerate other devices, access a microphone, store collected data locally and communicate with external infrastructure. Put that same device in a corporate office, hospital, hotel or conference room and the security implications become considerably more serious. I went through the investigation in detail, including the network scanning, microphone behavior, ACR, webOS attack surface, offline data collection and practical mitigations

  • DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    … Well great, now I have to check whether my television has a goddamn microphone for some reason. I didn’t think to check because it’s a television.

    Never connected it to the Wifi though.

    • yaroto98@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      And according to the article the data collection runs even if it’s disconnected. So, don’t ever connect it to the network. As soon as you do everything gets uploaded.

    • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This would’ve worked just a few years back but due to shitty “age verification” laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up. They may also implement an always-online model and they’ll justify that it’s necessary to monitor users for “age verification purposes”. ATP better to get a good monitor and use it as TV cuz cable or satellite boxes are either way gonna be provided by the network companies so that’s there

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        This would’ve worked just a few years back but due to shitty “age verification” laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up.

        Surely only for “smart” features but without enabling any of that shit, you shouldn’t get any age verification prompt.

        • thejml@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I could see them doing it anyway as OTA broadcasts include rating data.

          That said, if it’s a family TV, you’re never going to put everyone on it, just the oldest one anyway.

  • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Is this anything a VLAN and Pihole can’t fix?

    Edit: looks kind of impossible to prevent, if it can access an open Wi-Fi nearby.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Possible that they are piggy backing on other hidden networks. I remember there was a whole thing with Samsung years ago with their stuff doing something like that, and there are a few patents around that propose hidden networks from the “internet of things” days.

      I just don’t want to even truck with this nonsense, where the fuck is the line before we just stop using these things? I know there must not be a line, since we are talking about circumventing our shit spying on us like it is normal.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        All of this needs to be illegal, but piggybacking especially does. Circumventing the will of the end user (aka the person who should be considered the owner) as for what the product in their possession, home, and use does shouldn’t be tolerated

    • silicon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Also keep them off wifi/network and you should be good unless they’re smart enough to try to connect to any open network they can find like some sort of malware

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        unless they’re smart enough to try to connect to any open network they can find like some sort of malware

        Uhhhhhhh, bad news there. Many companies have been found to have their stuff make hidden networks and share info these days. I am sure you could figure out a work around if you are savvy enough, but the normal dood? Fucked and pretending this is normal.

        • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Yeah maybe there’s way to make a file explorer for them. Maybe there’s ways to jailbreak them. We focus on phones a lot, webos was on the hp bought out palm phones back in the 2010’s.

          We find out the operating systems, we jailbreak them and completely remove their programming and then, in-turn we can mess with hardware settings.

          So let’s start making a TV Linux that doesn’t suck or make an Ubuntu TV version or a KDE TV version.

          They can’t force people into using their OSes forever. The only thing I know is it’s like Pandoras battery trying to disable the wifi from the hardware.

  • kaitco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not just LG. It’s all of them.

    And, the cheaper the TV, the more often and intrusive these settings are.

    It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

      Consumer projectors come with the same “smart” shit as TVs these days. Just don’t connect either to WiFi. Problem solved.

      • undrwater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Apparently not solved. They can connect to open (and hidden) networks without your consent.

        Per the marketing chief at LG; (paraphrased, from memory) “we own the glass, and we know everything beyond the glass.”

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          They can connect to open (and hidden) networks without your consent.

          That’s a wild claim and either I accidentally skipped a paragraph in the article or you should cite a source. Quick googling doesn’t show up anything of that sort for me.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Look for articles about amazons sidewalk network and devices that connect to it without any kind of authorization from users.

            That shit has been around since the echo came out and it’s open to any manufacturer.

            There’s are lots of articles but my phone is too slow to load them at the moment.

          • undrwater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I’m looking for a source as well. The “apparently” I used was supposed to cover the whole comment, but I can see how it didn’t.

            The video goes into detail, and could be staged, but comments seem to support the idea anyway.

            Amazon devices are known to do this with other Amazon products to create a mesh.

            It’s not outside the realm of possibility.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    If you are going to have smart devices, put them on their own VLAN. They should not have access to the rest of your network. TVs shouldn’t be connected at all. Use a PC or android box if you want to stream stuff.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The issue in this case is that they apparently use text to speech locally, store that information on the device itself, and then if at any point in the future gets connected to the internet for any meaningful length of time (be it by a subsequent owner) it will then be sent on to LG… for safekeeping of course /s

      The deep-dive by GamersNexus is pretty in depth.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        In that case, it should be disposed of like an SSD that contains sensitive information. Find the flash chips and either drill holes through them or smash them into dust with a big hammer.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If I had a LG the on thing it would spy on would be the other untrusted shit I have on the vlan I let them use.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bosch fucking dishwashers do this, once connected there is no way to disconnect them so I sink all its outgoing traffick at the router level

    Complete garbage

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why would you connect a dishwasher to the internet? Setting a timer can tell you just as well if the dishes are clean.

    • fatcat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mh. What about… creating a guest network, connecting that abomination to that and deleting the guest network? Hopefully it can remember only one…

      • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Why wouldn’t a company this dedicated to advertising just install a cheap cell network modem in them? You’re talking pennies on a device that costs hundreds of dollars.

        • fatcat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          While this is possible, ongoing network costs are involved with that. Also, hard to hide a cell network modem.

          Not so sure if that is done when many people connect their device to their WiFi anyway, if they are forced to because some settings can be changed only with the app?

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        My TV is wired to the router but blocked from WAN access.

        Only connected to the internet to install jellyfin on it.

  • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    My LG TV is blocked from my network and always has been. However, the andriod tv connected to it is a different thing, so it’s more or less lost cause anyways and I haven’t had enough incentive to block the android box from the rest of network since it’d need some tweaking so that casting and other occasionally used features still work. And even if I’d block the android tv box there’s still our cellphones gathering all the data, so I’m pretty much just running things on hopium that EU offers at least some protection on my data.

  • Bluedragon012@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I want to care… I really do… But untill ceos and those who decided this was OK are killed, it will continue. Money means nothing to these evil people.