• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    ELI5: Why use /e/OS over Graphene? This isn’t a rhetorical rant; I’m genuinely curious.


    Edit: See below. I misphrased this question.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Sorry, I realize that question could be interpreted in two ways: I meant for Fairphone not to try to get Graphene working on their phone. I know Motorola is trying to do that right now, for example.

        • Baaron87@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          16 hours ago

          From what I’ve read elsewhere (seen some comments here, don’t remember the exact threads) the Graphene team has a specific hardware requirement that Fairphone doesn’t supply. Would be cool to see both projects working together though

          • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            GrapheneOS is also open source. Fairphone could realistically fork the project without meeting the requirements deemed necessary for the maintenance effort by upstream.

            • cunnililgus@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yes, but Fairphone is partnered with Murena (e/os), and there seems to be a beef between them and graphene, so I imagine its out of spite, too.

            • Baaron87@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              That would be awesome if they do so. I like /e/OS for what it is and does, my FP4 works great after all. That said, having the option for Graphene OS I feel would do nothing but benefit all parties, so hopefully that can be addressed at some point.

  • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I want to love this but I can’t compromise my security for this device. If y’all ever add MTE and the other features required by Graphene I’ll be the first in line

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Fair enough. But too many people think privacy and security are the same thing.

      GrapheneOS is dedicated to both privacy and security, whereas e/os (while it does have some security improvements over stock android) is much more focused on the privacy side of things.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There is some overlap. Can’t have privacy problems if everything’s encrypted and they have no access to your data in the first place

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You can still have privacy issues. For example, everything’s encrypted, but you’re the only one with the exact fingerprint so every adveriser and government agency knowns who you are