• greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I guess I don’t care. Like it’s mostly for AAA games which I don’t play and for Nvidia cards which I don’t own. And even if I could use it, it’s totally optional. Since it apparently sucks, I don’t think many people will use it.

  • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    If the point of the tech was to make Jesse Faden look like an old-aged pensioner, then mission accomplished.

    I’m sorry, but if my wife looked like this in her 60s and 70s I’d be very happy.

    She’s supposed to be 35 in the game. The videos in the article didn’t make her look older than 40. The article is hyperbole.

    Also that Skyrim character look bad regardless of DLSS on or off is not a surprise. Fans probably call it a feature. Just shows the tech isn’t magic.

  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Cool been waiting for this for a decade

    It looks really good too. What was all the hate about exactly?

    E: Since it is about artistic integrity you will shut the fuck up when a game is released with it, because that was the intended vision. Right? Right???

  • Zarobi@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    While the Skyrim example is more creepy than anything, as it gives all the characters this unnerving, dead-behind-the-eyes look

    I dunno, I think it’s an improvement. Have people really forgotten that Skyrim already had an “unnerving dead behind the eyes look”? It’s an old game. This technology looks better than most “HD texture packs” and model pack mods that many players consider mandatory…

    Before:

    After:

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You asked for it. Grok, enhance this guy’s ass.

        Tap for spoiler
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⠐⠂⠀⠐⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠒⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠂⠀⠀⠀
         ⠀⢈⡄⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢀⣤⣵⣶⣤⡀⠀⠃⠃⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠂⣰⡾⣷⣶⣶⣾⡿⠟⠿⢿⣿⣎⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⡇⡈⠉⠛⠉⣆⡸⠄⣰⣉⠻⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⣠⣤⣤⣽⣯⣾⣤⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠶⠙⣧⠀⠀⠀
        ⣤⡾⠿⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠲⣄⠀⠈⠈⠘⣧⠀⠀
          ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠀⢀⣀⠘⣇⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣧⣾⣿⣿⡿⢻⡆
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣼⣺⣿⣿⣿⠁⣀⣿⠃
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠄⢔⣿⠇⠀
        ⠀⠀⢀⣀⡄⣀⣴⠿⣋⠚⠿⠟⠛⠻⠋⠈⣒⣿⠟⠀⠀
        ⣶⠾⠟⣿⠟⠋⠀⢰⣯⡄⢄⠇⡐⠀⢂⣴⣿⠟⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀
        
    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      It takes any personality away and averages out to something that looks like in anything other. And then does not even fit into the art style and world of the rest of the game. Still image are one thing, moving and eventually speaking or making facial expressions together with other characters in a scenery is a different thing.

      This might improve games that were vibed together with Ai in the first place. But not artistic strong and beautiful games crafted by good artists.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The shots of the background already look realistic, and the shots of her face look like a different person

    • IamLost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Control does look more realistic. It’s not just making everyone into supermodels, but adding imperfections and flaws you see in real people. Whether that’s your preference or not is subjective, but it’s less like an Instagram filter than the last demonstration.