The reason this is important and timely is because the messaging around these tools implicitly suggests there is an air of authority and integrity it would be impossible for them to have given that no journalists have examined and analyzed the mechanisms of these tools at any stage of their development.
In fairness, a lot of news organisations are run without input from adequate journalists.
true, be nice if computer scientists had a good look instead
or maybe journos should check their sources properly like journalists do
Why on earth would a journalist need to have input on authentication tools??
Surely this would be more suited for a cybersecurity expert?
Not that I’d trust an AI-based authentication system anyway.
Exhibit A:) Liberal Arts education > STEM education
Rule 2.
Rules rules rules rules!
A very mature response, thank you.
Is it really necessary for me to explain why you should know this?!
Yes. It helps prevent low effort and low quality posts.
Your post is now locked until you correct it. Just message me when you’re done and I will unlock it.
Edit: I see you fixed it as I typed this.
lemmy.world is a damn trash heap facepalm
You’re welcome not to participate here.
Edit: I see you’ve made 13 posts in the last two hours. We strive quality over quantity here. As always, nobody is forcing you to include this community in your rapid fire posts.
I happily take that invitation!
“How come there are individuals that think on their own? I thought everything in the world was a reflection of my own consciousness. I cannot fathom a world where people don’t share my thoughts and experiences.”
Indeed, very few people know journalism jargon, and authentication has vastly different meanings depending on the sphere of human knowledge one is inserted into.
Alternatively:
“Surely the rules don’t apply to me?”
In fact, they do.
