• @StarManta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    382 years ago

    Trying to claim the term “Web3” is a futile battle. It is already widely understood to mean crypto and blockchain. If I see a job posting that says the company is built on Web3, I know immediately that the job is built on scams and grifts without having to ask further questions. Web3 as a term is ruined already.

    For this to work it must be a different term than Web3. Maybe “Web 3.0” is different enough?

  • Bappity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    it’s insulting to consider cryptocurrency or blockchain as any kind of next generation thing

    • @AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      No. Web2 is about user generated content (as opposed to the static pages of Web1) - crapto stuff hardly fits the bill. Like it or not, it really does belong to Web3 - which is about decentralization.

  • The dogspaw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    Don’t forget about nfts there the future man they can’t be replicated man where can you spend 100k and by the end of the week your investment is worh $3.50

    • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      NFTs weren’t created to be the proof of ownership of digital art, they just happen to be associated with that because that’s what the majority of them were created for.

      The NFT isn’t the art that can be copy-pasted to any computer, it’s the proof of ownership. Criticizing them by saying “I can just download a copy of the picture!” is like saying copyrights are useless because you can use tools to rip movies from streaming services, sure you “own a copy”, it doesn’t make you a rightful owner of it from the perspective of the law.

      • The dogspaw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        But there worthless because digital art is intrinsically less valuable than real art

        • @NecroSocial@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The intrinsic value of any art is what someone is willing to pay for it.

          For example the world’s most expensive NFT, The Merge by Pak, sold for $91.8 million. Its price was higher than the sale of Jeff Koon’s Rabbit, the most expensive artwork by a living artist at auction. It’s all about personal tastes and how deep folks wanna dig in their pockets with this stuff.

  • @MrSlicer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    Federation was we 1.0 people forget all major chatting services used to be integrated. You could have a yahoo im show up on your aim chatbox.

    • @wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The web was always decentralized though. In fact Web 3 brought more centralization. Everything is in the cloud now, which is really just two or three main data center operators. That’s my techno luddite take.

  • @Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I’ve been calling it web 1.5. It feels a lot like the web before web 2.0, but leverages improvements in technology and knowledge since then

  • squiblet
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    but how do I give someone .0045 cents for no apparent reason??

  • Free Palestine 🇵🇸
    link
    fedilink
    -12 years ago

    If Federation/Decentralization could be combined with decentralized crypto currency payments through something like Monero in a way that is not a scam, it would actually be great. We need some kind of monetization model for the Federated Web, and crypto currencies are actually great for that purpose but so far all implementations of this haven’t really worked or were just a scam.