- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
You must log in or # to comment.
The battery prototype demonstrated endurance, maintaining a stable structure and perfect reversibility over 6,000 cycles — equivalent to more than 16 years of daily operation — with zero loss in storage capacity.
WTF!? If this battery is just half as good as they claim, it could be a game changer for storing power for solar and wind!
Those are not the metrics that are important for storing wind and solar. Cost per MWh is the important one.
It is great to see, and isn’t an unreasonable jump from lifepo4. They already do 4-6k charge cycles with something like 20% degradation. This is a bigger deal for electronics and vehicles as it would make battery replacements unnecessary.
If all of the claims from Chinese tech companies and research was half as good as they claim we would all learn Mandarin by now.
That is exactly right, and simplified Chinese is actually extremely popular to learn here now. (Denmark)
And no wonder, they have become leaders of several key (future) technologies.Counter point: I know exactly one person who learned Mandarin and several dozen who don‘t. Pretty much everyone learned english and (to a lesser degree) a third language that isn‘t Mandarin either. French, Spanish and Japanese are popular, though.
Have you heard of a man named Elon Musk? He’s the king of over promising. US company’s put out just as much garbage “look we solved X” as China dude.
Classic Fediverse. Can‘t have China critique without the token whataboutism response.
They teach Mandarin in more US high schools every year
IF is doing quite a bit of heavy lifting there.
And yes IF it is as you said HALF that good, in either direction— the article mentioned ~80% under heavy loads. And that alone would be a game changer.
Energy storage is the “oil” of the future.
IF — we shall see. But I’m hopeful
The title is misleading.
“Throughout this period, the system remained free of harmful by-products or sediment while achieving a 99.4 percent leak-proof efficiency. Even at high power outputs, it retained 78.5 percent of its energy efficiency, proving that the design is both reliable and durable.”
99.4% leak proof against material transitioning within the membranes.
78.5% energy output efficiency.
And as others have said no useful metrics tbh.
Less talking about miracle batteries, more making miracle batteries 😡
They are being made, CATL is already making solid state batteries that break with traditional Lithium batteries on both price and safety. Mass production is expected by 2027.
Your comment is both ignorant and misleading.Solid state too? I know they started mass producing sodium-ion which is a huge deal but hadn’t heard abt solid state lithium.
Well maybe only semi, but real solid state is in preparation to be mass produced already 2027.
To be clear, I have a fair bit of confidence in CATL’s roadmap as they have delivered steadily over the years.
LESS TALKING MORE MAKING
Said the one who does nothing but talk and doesn’t make anything. 🤡
You dont know me wtf lol
Why is there never a single relevant metric mentioned? Here its only cycles and efficiency (which I assume is capacity).
