cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/44197
Australian scientists have developed an injectable therapy that helps clear blocked airways in flat-faced dogs. Melbourne-based biotechnology company Snoretox and RMIT University have shown early success using the first therapy from a new technology, known as Snoretox-1.
From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.
Or we could just stop breeding animals with hallmark genetic defects.
Why not both? This could help existing dogs live better lives.
Those were my thoughts in that order. But I’m very in favor of the projects to bring the breeds like pugs, and I think Boston terrier was another, closer to the original forms
Responsible breeding though, we have too many homeless animals as is
How about just banning the breeding of animals that were designed to suffer?
That should happen, but it’s also good that vets are trying to help these disabled critters lead better lives. And if it becomes adaptable to some humans with disabilities, so much the better.
I’ve read somewhere that some boxer lines are being bred with longer muzzles.
Just happy someone cares, but yeah cosmetic and backyard breeders have got to go.
Because of the adopt-first movement, backyard and pedigree breeders are all that’s left in the US.
I don’t deny your claim but I’m not enough coffees deep to follow
What other choice is there in other countries?
Working dogs are bred for fitness at their task. Many of these breeds are now neurotic because they are without duty over many generations.
I’m sure there are still plenty of good working dog breeders on farms. But, I honestly don’t know who in the world is breeding dogs fit for house pets. Some of the Victorian era breeds had that goal, but have since drifted into… problems.
Agreed!
I hadn’t thought of working dogs.
Bichon frises, you know, those purse dogs? I hear they make great apartment dogs too. But I don’t know dogs very well
deleted by creator
I didn’t pay attention to the photos when I read the article, but your comment made me go back and look at them. You’re referring to the two sad-looking dogs in the basket, right?
I’m curious what gave it away to you first. For me what did it was the eyes. The reflections are all different.
I’m also sad, why couldn’t they just include pictures of the actual dogs?
Actually, yes. Since copyright doesn’t apply to slop, they can in fact take credit. Ethically stupid, but legally allowed.
Would this be adaptable to help with sleep apnea in humans?
deleted by creator





