• T. Hex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They’re usually the same PDF that’s designed for a giant paper menu, so I feel like I’m reading a huge document through a peephole.

      A “responsive” website that reshapes the document to fit your screen size is usually a better experience. But I’ve certainly seen it done poorly and wished they hadn’t tried to be clever.

      • Problem-based person@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Also, PDFs exported for printing are full-quality without lossy compression. I once downloaded a 150 MB menu because the graphic designer exported the PDF with images without any compression or resizing whatsoever.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      the fact that they embedded it inline so it downloads instead of rendering on the page.

      it’s because most of these sites are hosted from vendors that charge per “change” and small businesses will point their dynamic stuff to google drive which doesn’t always allow stuff to be embedded and rendered within HTML. google does this to combat abuse like this where companies will host their entire website from a Google drive for “free”.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        My assumption would’ve been they do PDFs, because they have the same menu printed out in their restaurant. They’re gonna need an A4/letter size format either way, so PDF is the simplest way of putting that same format onto their webpage.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          you’re correct.

          also, PDFs aren’t limited to A4. I have PDFs that span thousands of A4 pages that is meant for a large format plotter printer.