• ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s interesting that when a company fires a bunch of employees just to increase quarterly profit, the employees no longer feel any duty to keep the company secrets. Which hurts company profits even more.

    Good.

      • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, it’s one of those things everyone assumes or guesses. When it’s confirmed by someone by name that has insider knowledge, the theory carries a lot more weight. Enough to alter stock prices, if it’s damning enough. Or in this case further hurt public perception, which hurts revenue.

    • Silki@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think valve does same too but different approach, they just don’t hire anyone for keeping paychecks for themselves

  • Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wouldn’t mind more competition but there’s literally no reason to use egs over valve.

    An example is instead of having a better review system than steam’s basic good or bad they could of had a good, maybe, bad then had separate reviews for reviewing specific patches or something. But no the CEO said reviews are bad for devs LOL.

    On top of that he’s been vocal about being anti Linux and is full of garbage hot takes. And it really says a lot when he lays off staff that are part for Fortnite’s $1.1 billion made

    • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      EGS isn’t competing with Steam because Timmy is on record saying his customers are devs and publishers. The rest of us are just pay piggies who should be happy to give money to him.

  • gegil@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have so many free games from epic, but absolutely nothing is interesting to me.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh hey it’s me

    I collected the free games almost religiously for maybe a couple of years, mostly so I had something of a backup library in case something terrible happened to Steam

    I stopped after realising I was literally only interacting with that store literally to collect the games, I don’t think I put a single minute into any of them

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Reminder: Epic CEO Tim Sweeney has defended child pornography, saying that stopping it is “gatekeeping”.

    ITT: pedo defenders

  • tomkatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    I get free Epic games from Prime Gaming, but I refuse to redeem them on principle. You couldn’t pay me to use Epic, or even give them an inkling that I support them.

    I considered it briefly when they launched, and then they pulled the bullshit of game exclusivity on PC, which is why I left consoles behind. Because of that, I’ll never purchase from them.

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      1st paragraph - a mirror. As if I’m writing this.

      2nd paragraph - even tho I hate exclusivity that they have established, it is not primary reason why I would never use EGS. For me, primary one would be them having a downright crap launcher. The rest is just more reasons to skip using EGS.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well no shit, 3 years of Epic have over 300 games haven’t spent a dime on their platform. Games I really want and willing to spend money goes to Steam.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I dont have quite as many, but I only spent about 5 dollars on a dlc for cities skyline. That is the extent I have spent on egs. Steam on the other hand…

  • Schal330@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Marginally profitable.” Profit is profit, and their end goal of giving people a library to drive sales has worked.

    Competition is good, for end consumers, but not a chance I’m going to be using EGS. They had no interest in making things better for consumers, especially with trying to create exclusivity in PC gaming.

    • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Its existence and with Gog they offer an alternative to steam if steam bans a game and to prevent its theoretical rise to evil after gaben dies.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Its also that EGS is terrible.

      The most recent “feature” they added that made a difference, was the ability to view my own library.

      8(?) Years after launch it still operates like a prototype I’d cobble together in an afternoon

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Plus we all know that if EGS ever achieved market dominance, they’d enshittify in no time.

        That was surely always the plan right. Lure users with good prices and free games, grow the platform, then extract profit.

        But the plan didn’t work, and so after all this time they’re still stuck on “best behaviour” mode trying to lure users who aren’t coming.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I use it for Alan wake and I use gog for cyberpunk because I got a better price for it on gog.

    Also I still have to run everything through steam because neither of those have controller support that actually works.

    That’s one of the biggest issues I have. They don’t even have basic functions like controller support.

    Ridiculous.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even the freebies that I want to play, I almost never play through Epic, and usually wait until I get another copy on Steam. The overall experience of playing a game through Epic is just… bleugh.

    I think I’ve only completed one game on Epic, Layers of Fear 2. The other stuff I’ve played has essentially been like playing a demo, to see if it’s worth adding to my Steam wishlist. That’s how subtractive to the enjoyment of gaming Epic is.

    I also just dislike their practice of exclusivity and feel uncomfortable supporting it with my wallet. At least with Ubisoft, EA and Rockstar, it’s only their own games they wall off like that, and they almost always have a Steam-connected version so there’s at least the illusion of having everything in one place. Epic is a black hole. I don’t even remember the games that have been or are still exclusive there, because I just never encounter any information about them apart from occasional news articles about how unprofitable they’ve been even after X-number of years. It’s kinda sad, for the devs who work hard on something for years and 8 people play the fucker.

  • Kage@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Heh i got Satisfactory during the Epic Exclisivity Deal there and bought it again when it got to steam, maybe a bit stupid but man, i hate Epic Games

  • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I used it for Mechwarrior because it was exclusive. Never ended up playing it because my computer was a bit glitchy at the time. Now that I’ve upgraded the computer, I would rather play the games I have on steam rather than install epic for one game.