He said that the tariff is $1 per barrel of oil, adding that empty tankers can pass freely. “Once the email arrives and Iran completes its assessment, vessels are given a few seconds to pay in Bitcoin, ensuring they can’t be traced or confiscated due to sanctions,” Hosseini added.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Bitcoin is for dodging sanctions and the influence America has over the international banking and payment systems. It’s also may shield third parties from sanctions the US may impose on those who transact with Iran.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’m surprised Elon didn’t convince them to take the payments in Dogecoin…

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Purchasing drugs for yourself shouldn’t be a crime, so it’s awesome that cryptocurrencies exist for this purpose.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    23 days ago

    It’s ok because the binance CEO guy purchased a pardon in helping Iran laundering their BTC

  • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 days ago

    How could that work? Doesn’t it take some time for a bitcoin transaction to get pulled into the chain?

    • commander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 days ago

      At the size of transactions they’d be doing, it’d probably be worth it to set a high fee so that it gets picked up and processed faster. Should still be peanuts compared to the value of cargo these tankers are carrying

      • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        Doesn’t that require trust in the provider hosting the off chain transactions? And lightning transactions can get preempted by conflicting moves from a wallet, and invalidated? I’m no expert, but it seems like these big regular transactions would be targets for abuse.

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Yes, as far as I understand it. No you create a mutisignature wallet first that holds the funds that can be moved around the layer 2 network.

          On chain makes more sense for this application to me too

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’d absolutely use crypto if it was more available in anything I’d want to pay for. So far it’s mostly just VPNs and donations

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 days ago

      People tried that, it failed. It’s too volatile.

      It’s basically a way for people to think they are being sneaky and shit when it’s all trackable anyways.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    Preferred crypto payment is USDT (Thether) stable coin. Which is the least US regulated, and most popular, US $ equivalent/backed stable coin. They are unlikely to refuse bitcoin, though.