• teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      1 month ago

      They want to be able to remotely disable vehicles, but in the process have made us vulnerable to all sophisticated actors to do so. Our leaders have their priorities all screwed up.

      • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wait, are you telling me…

        …that a device meant to disable a vehicle

        …was used to disable a vehicle?

        Whould’ve thought?

  • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Boo for the cyber attack but fuck people who drive drunk repeatedly to the point of needing an interlock device. Maybe don’t drink and drive you fucking sack of shit.

      • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        100% for most places. However I’ll say Ive known alot of folks who will go up into the bush and get blasted only to drive home. I doubt transit would stop that shit.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I can think of plenty, just oh shit we have to get to the hospital please take us to the hospital with a legitimate oh shit we have to get to the hospital tends to override most traffic bullshits. Making the judgment of whether something is a legitimate oh shit we need to get to the hospital is why we have EMTs but like, if the Friday night shift knows you have emergencies when you eat buttered popcorn and there’s a new bee movie out they might just expect you to drive yourself (or rather, have a trusted friend and swearing team buddy) because you’re half expecting a damn emergency at the bee movie and you’ve had twelve too many, they know which roads to keep clear of toddlers and the elderly. Damn bees.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Never knew anyone who had one, but a friend of mine dated a guy who did. He would beg her to breathe into it for him.

      • TwilitSky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s insane but as an alcoholic I can absolutely see someone doing it.

        Some are social butterflies who have to be out and about but talk about not learning lessons.

        • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Not learning lessons” is a pretty mild way to put it.

          The only way it isn’t pure evil is if we allow that the alcoholic is not in control of their actions. And if we allow that, they cannot be trusted to drive, or really to even have their freedom. They are 5150, plain and simple.

          • TwilitSky@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’re in control but reaching them is something best done by people like them in my experience.

            Logic only goes so far, clearly.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I know someone that did it once and having to have one of these as a result. Suggest you reset your opinions a bit.

          • _g_be@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            What kind of emergency is more important than the lives of people that might be killed by a drunk driver’s mistake? And how is it impossible to find an alternative solution?

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Where do you guys live? Is it America? Because I kinda feel like in America I’m never surprised that someone drove drunk.

              (Especially before Uber.)

          • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            What emergency is so time sensitive it’s worth killing yourself and a random family for?

                • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  honestly, any emergency that involves hitting you and yours. that’s because i don’t feel like remembering them. i’ve been the car that the police pulls over because it’s driving erratically and then takes over driving. it’s an abstract concept to you. not to me.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        “I know someone who only did a murder once and they locked them right up. Suggest you reset your opinions a bit.”

        Replace murder with any crime.

        If you don’t want to face the consequences, don’t do the action that begets the consequences.

        TLDR: don’t fuck around if you don’t wanna find out.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.

            • plz1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                When you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know someone that DID IT ONCE and having to have one of these as a result. Suggest you reset your opinions a bit.

        You mean he got caught once.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Hegseth is gonna be even more angry than born normal when he can’t drive from point a to point b because of this.

  • Sunkblake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Internet connected breathalyzer… May I ask why? If they need periodic recalibrations all of them don’t need it right now no?

    Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had one disable my car in rush hour traffic in another city on a roadtrip, they had no way to do anything to get me back up and running. I assume this is for those kinds of cases. I was taking up a lane on the interstate with a cop staring at me, trying to hum the little fucker back to life while a tow truck came.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    How are these people planning to drive? The cost of fuel is excruciating! If it wasn’t because of Operation Epstein Fury, driving may have been an option.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    A “cyberattack”? Or vibe coded AI slop running as intended?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Only those cars that needed a breathalyzer for reasons.

    Not much of a loss, I’d say.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Per bidens Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, that’s going to be every new car starting this year

      • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Passive systems, not a breathalyzer. Still fucking stupid but one can disable the cameras or stop the vehicle from phoning home. They won’t be able to disable your vehicle remotely and it appears to be more a while driving thing rather than a before driving thing.