• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I thought smart glasses could be kind of neat, but no way in hell would I get a pair from Meta.

    • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I wish I can look back at my entire day and see what I did. (It will mostly just be computer, kitchen and bathroom only, but still a cool idea)

      I changed my mind

  • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    An ant doesn’t care that you’re watching it until you try to step on it. Why do you think that these bug people would care until it’s too late?

  • bassow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Without the Meta layer (which you can just not install), the basic smart RayBans are actually pretty nice. The audio is pretty good and it works with any other assistant you may have configured. I wish they had a version without the camera.

  • ravelin@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    sensitive and personal footage captured by the devices—including people going to the bathroom, getting dressed, and having sex—is being reviewed

    I wanna know… Or maybe I don’t… Who is it that sees someone wear these glasses and decides that they wanna f— them WITH THE GLASSES ON.

    Don’t get me wrong, I wear (normal) glasses and I like the way I look, but how can THESE glasses be anything but a major turn off?