howdy@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agowomenlemmy.mlimagemessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1756arrow-down146
arrow-up1710arrow-down1imagewomenlemmy.mlhowdy@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square66linkfedilink
minus-squareLost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 months agoNo. They’re saying that 93% + 93% = 186%.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoNo. Go big or go home.
minus-squareQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agowell if 93% is currently 10,000 murders, then women doing 10,000 murders would hypothetically turn it to 50% edit: well maybe like 57% because they already have the other 7%? but it would be lower because there is more total? I confused myself
Wouldn’t it be 50%?
No. They’re saying that 93% + 93% = 186%.
No. Go big or go home.
well if 93% is currently 10,000 murders, then women doing 10,000 murders would hypothetically turn it to 50%
edit: well maybe like 57% because they already have the other 7%? but it would be lower because there is more total? I confused myself