• dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    The training data contains writing that downplays the negative impact of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, probably along with a healthy dose of writing from people like Douglas MacArthur and Curtis “Bombs Away” LeMay, evangelists of the tactical use of nuclear weapons and the belief that sufficient bombing would “break” the will of an enemy (despite zero examples of that happening until the use of nukes on Japan.)

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Terminator might be a little more popular.

      It seems the only way to win is not to play.

      • Malgas@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Another that comes to mind, Colossus is…well, not this exact scenario, but relevant.

  • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think the big issue is the personification of AI. They’re not people and dont have the same amount of reasoning as a person.

    Ai should really just be used for specific use cases like a tool. A hammer is just for hammering.

    I guess the main issue is at that point AI should specifically be used more like a computer application rather than a Swiss army knife. So the way it’s commonly used in its chatbot format isn’t necessarily a good or safe way to implement and use it.