The SAVE Act passed the House on Feb. 11, 2026 by a vote of 218-213 and is now in the Senate awaiting a vote. Voting is expected to take place next week, according to Thune. If and when it passes the Senate, it will go to the president for a final signature.

Will SAVE Act Prevent Married Women from Registering to Vote?

By Hadleigh Zinsner

Posted on February 28, 2025

Q: Is it true that under the SAVE Act married women will not be able to register to vote if their married name doesn’t match their birth certificate?

A: The proposed SAVE Act instructs states to establish a process for people whose legal name doesn’t match their birth certificate to provide additional documents. But voting rights advocates say that married women and others who have changed their names may face difficulty when registering because of the ambiguity in the bill over what documents may be accepted.

FULL ANSWER

  • minorkeys@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’ll go after each demographic whose voting habits favour democrats: Immigrants, women, educated, non-christian, poor, lbgtq+, young, non-white. Whichever ones you belong to, makes you a potential target of voter disenfranchisement. At he same time making it easier for: old, male, white, Christian, wealthy, uneducated, straight, multi-generational American.

    • tino_408@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a non white lol why can’t I vote? I’m a legal citizen I will have no issue. I would like to know what rights the whites have over me?

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Rights? Have you been paying attention?

        They’re blatantly and regularly violating the first, second, fourth, and fifth amendments whenever they feel like it.

        They’re absolutely going to have ICE around harassing anyone they think might vote blue, particularly people of color.

      • galacticbackhoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You don’t know if you won’t have issues or not. Their whole goal is to create issues.

        Live in a black area of a county in GA? Close down the polling station.

        Look Hispanic near a polling station? Maybe ICE tackles you and arrests you for no reason.

        Woman and your name doesn’t match? No vote.

        It’s really not hard to understand what they’re trying to do. Whites don’t have more rights than you on paper. They would love to change that, and they start by bending and then breaking the law.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    20-30% of women keep their maiden name after marriage.

    Liberal women are roughly twice as likely as conservative women to keep their maiden name.

    So yeah, conservative women screwing themselves and also handing a minor edge to liberal women.

    • GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If I’m understanding this correctly, passports are also a valid form of citizenship. Passports are usually held by people who lean left, so this could be another advantage the left has in this insane proposition.

      I hope passports will remain good enough. I was born to irresponsible teenagers and was legally adopted by one parent, and none of them gave me a copy of my birth certificate. I’m starting to worry that it would be worth tracking it down so I’ll have a copy just in case.

      This is all so insane, getting our papers in order in case we need to show them to avoid getting disappeared.

  • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is from USA Today. This is where political journalism is:

    Will the SAVE America Act pass the Senate? Odds, predictions

    The odds of the SAVE America Act passing the Senate and signed into law in 2026 are 12% according to the Polymarket betting odds, and the Kalshi market odds show 13.9% confidence that it will become law.

  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Looking forward to being a future target for never having married and/or taken a man’s name next!

    None of us are safe until all of us are safe.

  • Ksin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not having any form of national ID really does lead to some goofy shit when you need to positivly identify people.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Our elections take place inside the state where we reside. We have state ID with a picture and the voting rolls match our address. It’s a pretty simple process that has worked for the last 40 years or so. I’ve always had to provide proof ID and residence to vote

    • bridgeburner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right? Imagine claiming to be the greatest country on earth and then not even have a national ID, something I bet even every third world country has lol. The US is such a circus lol.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        We’ve fought having a national ID for decades, with consideration to an administration similar to the current one taking over. We didn’t want the nazis running around demanding papers 10 years ago. It was trumps voting base that was most opposed to it 😭😅

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Historically this was actively fought as an anti-fascist concern. Up until recently it was a big human right issue that you should not be required to show identification except in limited circumstances

        And of course now with all the surveillance, tracking, and data collection, it’s more important than ever …… just as we no longer care

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    I guess all those blue haired feminists that refused to get married or change their last names still get to vote

  • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If your name doesn’t match what’s on your birth certificate, look into whether your state allows you to change your birth certificate and do it before it’s too late. My name is not my birth name or my married name, I had it legally changed. I got tired of hauling around my birth certificate, marriage certificate, divorce paperwork, and legal name change to show the paper trail that I both was who I was and was no longer legally married. Turns out in my state I just had to send in a notarized form, copies of my paperwork and pay small fee and I got my birth certificate updated to my current name. Now I can “prove” who I am by just showing my birth certificate and ignore the fact that I was married and changed my name. It also made updating my passport easier. Granted, I am not trans, but I did it last year and they had the option to change gender on the form.

    • Gathorall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      How isn’t showing your passport sufficient evidence to tell you are who you tell you are?

      • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not everyone has their passport. If you do, that should be sufficient. It also made updating my passport easier, way less paperwork to send in. I’d never gotten around to updating my passport to the correct name and it was much less paperwork to send in.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait, this is even dumber then it looks like. Under this crap unmarried women will be unaffected but the more traditional marriage types will be hooped. So this will remove the “trad” wife votes but not touch the ladies in say the local polycule. Gee I wonder if all the single/divorced women will be more or less likely to vote for the red party?

    • Wilmo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t even matter. If only men vote then Republicans win. Women add more votes to Democrats. Removing them from the picture for voting simply helps Republicans.

    • Rakudjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      “My husband votes conservative for the both of us. A woman’s place is serving God and her husband, not having a right to an opinion.”

      -Conservative women, probably

  • Xenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    So hear me out. Conservatives are more likely to take someone’s last name than a liberal couple right? Doesn’t this disproportionately disenfranchise Republican women? Could this potentially actually harm the Republican vote?

    • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of states have been banning name changes for trans people, I think this was a dumb attack on trans people.

    • nocturne@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      When my wife and I married she only took my last name because her father abandoned her when she was 6 months old, and she wanted to erase that from her identity.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah. But the hit to potential Democratic voters will make it worth their while.

      Essentially women would need to provide additional paperwork in order to vote. Republican women have that paperwork, or can get it easier.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d be willing to bet this will disenfranchise more republican women than democrat women. Democrats are way more likely to have a passport