• Enceladus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    They missed the EV push in the 90’ by GM, in the 2010’ by Tesla and now once again. They would never change without market pressure.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    “It’s bad for consumers” is one of those phrases that’s been misused so often I’m amazed these cunts still try to use it with a straight face. It’s like “I’m not racist, but” in terms of phrases that are widely understood to mean their direct opposite.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not sure anyone actually does fall for it per se; it’s one of those lies that literally everyone knows is a lie, but CEOs and corrupt politicians need it to be true in order to justify what they want to do next so they have to go through the process of saying it first.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You must have the pleasure of not knowing those people, then. A lot of people genuinely still believe in trickle-down economics and the like.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 days ago

    When all you want to do is sell vastly more expensive but quality poor versions of last century’s product, you should be afraid. American automakers have had the government prop up their manufacturing for decades leaving the rest of the world open to create this century’s products.

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh man…I am American but I yearn for the day when I can buy a pickup with a full bed the size of a Daewoo Lanos

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    This might be the best thing to happen to Americans in a long time and it’s the result of shitty anti consumer US policy 😂 at long last I might be able to buy a Toyota helix

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think you mean this as deserved punishment and I agree, but maybe there’s also a silver lining: we deserve this, to break up the dead dinosaur cartel, to restart innovation, to free consumers from a prison of protectionism around overpriced legacy vehicles and help light the way to future technology

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    3 days ago

    God I fucking hate stealerships. If car dealer cartels in the US as a concept die as a result of this era of idiocy we’re in, that’s a pretty great silver lining.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Um, only having been tourist to the US, how does it work?

        Edit: the car dealership. What’s different to e.g. Europe (the referenced American only practice)

          • Strider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The first comment talks about stealership, the next about weird us practice and I have no idea what they are referring to 😁.

            In Europe we habe car dealers, franchise, independent or do buy privately but they can all act independently.

            Is there a cartel or something in the US for car dealerships?

            • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              In most states, manufacturers are prohibited from selling directly to consumers.

              There are a variety of reasons for it, some were consumer-friendly (like preventing the manufactures from monopolizing repair/service), but it basically created a system of middlemen that raised costs.

              I worked at a Honda dealership in college and I learned a lot.

              For example, when you finance through a dealership, the dealer doesn’t actually put up any money. They find a 3rd party financer then tack on a few percentage points.

              Salespersons also earn higher commissions on dealer-provided upsales, such as window-etching, rust-preventative, custom badging, extended warranties, etc, so they try to push those things.

              Dealers are also locked into individual manufacturers, usually. That is, a “family” of dealerships, are actually multiple businesses, each with a contract with a different manufacturer.

              The person that owned the Honda dealership I worked at, owned others. On one side, they had a Pontiac-Buick-GMC dealer, then Chevy, Chevy truck, and Cadillac on the other side. Even they it was all General Motors, they were run separately. Down the street, they had a dealership that sold both new Toyotas and Subarus.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Want wasn’t it regean that made it a law you couldn’t buy directly from the manufacturer because he was buddies with people who owned major dealerships. And it just stuck since then.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Things like that and tariffs are absolutely useful tools for trade issues: TARGETED, TEMPORARY tools. There would have been nothing wrong with temporary protection for Harley Davidson if it were temporary, if there was a deadline where they have to start competing again.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Regulations were put in place to prevent manufacturers from opening their own stores right next to the dealers they worked with. Dealers assume some risk when they take on inventory. Apparently it’s not like a bookstore where any unsold copies just go back to the publisher. It’s still a flimsy justification though and enshrined these middlemen who then enshittified everything. Worse, in some cases manufacturers are entirely prevented from selling direct, even if they don’t work with dealerships. It’s too much.

  • kalkulat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    “It’s bad for our industry, it’s bad for our country, it’s bad for consumers.”

    I think they (accidentally, of course) left out the people that it’s worst for.

    Once these guys are gone, where are the Better Business Bureaus gonna find smarmy guys in suits?

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ah, the “American dream”. Competition. Sadly only if it is competition not just lobbying power.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I see we’re in the "find out’ stage of FAFO. Well all the other industries in the Us are imploding, we might as well do the auto industry too. You auto workers are welcome to pull up a stump in front of this nice flaming trashcan I am warming my hands to.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    At least for the last year, the only thing that has tempered Donald’s worst impulses is markets.

    So in a way, these kinds of movements and deals are essential to international security.