• early_riser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    We really need to make people more aware of how their data gets from A to B. I think most people think you need internet access for anything connected to a network to communicate. If more people realized that if device A is on your LAN and device B is on your LAN, there’s no reason traffic from A to B has to traverse the internet, they wouldn’t fall for stuff like this.

      • early_riser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Indeed, a lot of people think it’s an active satellite connection when all it is is a receiver picking up a really accurate time signal.

    • bcgm3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      What’s more, if the device in question is some simple thing like a thermometer, then there’s no reason for it to be networked at all. Just take the temperature and get on with your life!

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hate that anything smart needs my location to be enabled before it will work even if it’s use is unrelated to location. Like my smart light bulbs. Why do they need to know a location ever

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    and the best is when the servers the use to send verification emails are crazy slow so you make a throwaway email (because fuck giving them your email, also handy to track who sells it and who they sell it to), go through their bullshit registration, then nothing. You checked spam even. You think you fucked up, and click resend email, still nothing. You give up and you can’t really use your new thing. Maybe you return it, if you’re smart. Then the next day you finally get the email, which indicates they clearly care about the user experience since they put so many resources into onboarding

  • Stegget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    But we do have flying cars. They’re called planes. You can get a license to fly them and everything.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure. But you need to think lived experience, less technical specifications. Think of how these machines actually interact with everyday life. Car and bus are socially defined categories. We could just classify them all as automobiles, but we have separate classifications for cars and buses because people interact with them in fundamentally different ways.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Right and I’m saying that there is a class of small plane that people, particularly in remote areas, use as personal transportation. Commercial jets are flying buses, the Cessna 172 is not. Your “um actually” is a false generalization.

            • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              And some people use full sized buses as their personal vehicles. Weird edge cases aren’t how we define words. Your exception proves the rule. This isn’t “umm actually,” this is you being deliberately obtuse.

              We’re talking about how 99% of people actually interact with these machines, not a handful of oddballs living in rural Alaskan homesteads. Those few rare edge cases are not how words are defined.

              Planes, for 99% of the population, are more like buses than cars. When people say, “flying car,” they specifically mean a flying vehicle that:

              1. Can provide point-to-point transport.
              2. Can be operated on your schedule.
              3. Doesn’t require expensive licensing and training (at least no more than a regular drivers license.)
              4. Can be owned or operated by the typical American family living in a typical American neighborhood.

              This is what a flying car is, and it’s why planes are not flying cars.

              Have you literally never seen any media depicting flying cars? Are you really that incapable of seeming the difference between this:

              And this?:

              For 99% of the population, the idea of using the latter for a personal vehicle is comical. You need to have a pilot’s license, and you need to own a god-damn runway in order to use it as a personal vehicle! The vision of a flying car has always been something that you could park in an ordinary suburban garage, pull it out into the driveway, and vertically takeoff without requiring you to own a giant piece of land. This is why you only see two types of people use planes for personal transport - the incredibly wealthy, or folks who live in extremely rural areas where large amounts of land are comically cheap. And it has to be something you can keep on your own land. If you have to drive to an airport to use it, you’re no longer fulfilling the point-to-point on-demand dream that the vision of flying cars represents.

              Again, you need to focus on the social definition, not the technical one.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      We also have actual flying cars but they consume so much energy that they can only fly for a few minutes. Turns out rolling wheels is a lot more energy efficient than lifting up a 2000 pound vehicle.

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    You thought they would research how to make life better, while they researched how to get more value from the customer.

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Was actually looking at these probe thermometers to give as Christmas presents this year… some brands actually advertise that they connect to nothing and need no phone or account to operate.

  • WeirdSarah9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I got two e-mails just for these type of situations.

    One e-mail for the accounts I REALLY need/want/will keep (games, social media…)

    While my second one is just used for accounts I’ll only use once and those types of stuff.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is the way.

      What my sibling does is create a separate email (though an email service that supports it like proton) for every service. If someone sells them out to marketers, the spam will go to “patsdogfoodemail@protonmail.com” or something like that, and they’ll know exactly which company was responsible, and where to block all the spam from.

      And keep yet another, totally unrelated email for finances, so there’s less chance it’s ever hacked.

    • early_riser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I use simplelogin.io plus a cheap throwaway domain, every single service I sign up for has different credentials, so the absolute worst that could happen if this server got hacked is someone could log in as me.

  • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago
    • Flying cars - impractical
    • Jetpacks - do exist, but limited to trained operators in special locations
    • Robot butler - robot waiters already exist, so it wouldn’t be terribly difficult to repurpose one (although they’re only sold to businesses as far as I could tell)