• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    Am engineer. Know zero professional people in the engineering community who use AI browsers, and very few who even touch AI for anything aside from docs or stats.

    In my personal life I know zero people who use these browsers. I think this is just panic from the higher ups at Mozilla who have no idea what in the fuck the company should be doing or is about, even.

    Start making tools to give to people to combat this bullshit from the EU. Build a USABLE and decentralized chat app that people can actually use FFS. Build something like Proton and ACTUALLY BECOME SELF-SUFFICIENT.

    Others have eaten your lunch because of this exact thing. Do better.

    • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      22 days ago

      The main use for AI that I’ve seen in my circles is a search engine replacement. Not because AI is a good search engine, but because search engines have largely become useless.

      If Mozilla wants to cement their place, create a better search engine. It’s how Google came to control a huge portion of the internet, and there’s now a huge vacuum waiting for someone to replace what we lost.

    • setsubyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 days ago

      very few who even touch AI for anything aside from docs or stats

      Not even translation? That’s probably the biggest browser AI feature.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      What about all those ladder climbers who want to sound like they’re tapped in to the pulse of cutting edge technology to the bosses? I work with engineers and it seems to be pretty split between full adoption and full rejection.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        LLMs aren’t going to make you good at your job.

        If you lacked coming in and relied on this bullshit, you’ll suck even more going out when they figure out you can’t have a conversation about the thing you were hired to be an expert on, buddy.

        Good luck to you.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Im genuinely confused by your reply. I wasn’t referring to ladder climbers in a positive light. I see them shoehorning AI into pointless projects that dazzle the bosses because they don’t know any better or because they want to dazzle their own bosses with more mumbo jumbo derived from their own reports.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      I think this is just panic from the higher ups at Mozilla who have no idea what in the fuck the company should be doing or is about, even.

      There’s another possibility I don’t see anyone talking about. It could just be the higher ups at Mozilla doing the old performative “we’re doing AI” dance for their shareholders and the investment community. Everyone assumes they are 100% sincere about embracing AI but this could simply be them paying the AI tax that all companies seem required to pay right now.

      If this is plausible, then we should just wait for it to manifest as actual feature changes and then judge. Right now this is just high level messaging and PR.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        If you’ve not been paying attention to their other random products, it would seem this is unlikely.

        They just jump from random thing to random thing and collect money along the way, draining the coffers with their C-level titles. Absolutely bullshit.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      Small LLMs could be useful in-browser for automating actions - e.g. reject all cookie/tracking popups. Consent-o-matic only works for half the sites I encounter and doesn’t support mobile

      Security however is another rabbit hole

          • tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Curious. There are certain ones it doesn’t work on, both on desktop and mobile, but works as normal other than that. Maybe check your settings?

      • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Yeah, no. LLMs are known untrustworthy so need a validation step so they aren’t a great fit for any automation you don’t look at… unless you don’t really care about the outcome

        What would work here is a browser API for cookie settings. You set your preferences with the browser and the sites check the browser. I don’t think this is likely to happen because people with influence and money in tech wouldn’t be able to point to how annoying the modals are and say “Look X government is doing something we don’t like so you should be angry and not trust them”

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        LLMs are useful for summarization. That is it.

        How often are you needing a summary of the thing that you’re browsing at the moment?

    • 474D@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      22 days ago

      “Am engineer”. This is reddit level cringe stuff. There are tons of engineers, we’re not special and most of us are equally dumb. Its funny you mention proton when they’ve made pro-***** statements and then trying to stay neutral in the blowback. “AI” has its uses like you said, in docs and stats. Firefox will NEVER be self-sufficient because they exist on funding from Google to exist as their only competition to not be a browser monopoly. As much as we hate it, there is a complicated line to be towed here. Mozilla isn’t perfect, but they’re far from an enemy here. The Firefox forks we love so much won’t exist without this