• ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    20 days ago

    Small LLMs could be useful in-browser for automating actions - e.g. reject all cookie/tracking popups. Consent-o-matic only works for half the sites I encounter and doesn’t support mobile

    Security however is another rabbit hole

        • tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          Curious. There are certain ones it doesn’t work on, both on desktop and mobile, but works as normal other than that. Maybe check your settings?

    • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yeah, no. LLMs are known untrustworthy so need a validation step so they aren’t a great fit for any automation you don’t look at… unless you don’t really care about the outcome

      What would work here is a browser API for cookie settings. You set your preferences with the browser and the sites check the browser. I don’t think this is likely to happen because people with influence and money in tech wouldn’t be able to point to how annoying the modals are and say “Look X government is doing something we don’t like so you should be angry and not trust them”

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      LLMs are useful for summarization. That is it.

      How often are you needing a summary of the thing that you’re browsing at the moment?