I guess it depends how on one classes “self-employed” - still wouldn’t be the majority but it could be potentially 15% of the population.
(Petty is just the anglicised form. I have no loyalty to the French)
The better heuristic is to consider the revolutionary potential; how much value is given to private property and how much one benefits from the fall of the US empire. It cuts like a knife through warm butter and better illuminates which parts of the labour aristocrats, proleteriat in the west and the petite borugoisie to target.
(Petty is just the anglicised form. I have no loyalty to the French)
Haha fair. Never seen someone use “petty” over “small”
The better heuristic is to consider the revolutionary potential; how much value is given to private property and how much one benefits from the fall of the US empire. It cuts like a knife through warm butter and better illuminates which parts of the labour aristocrats, proleteriat in the west and the petite borugoisie to target.
I guess it depends how on one classes “self-employed” - still wouldn’t be the majority but it could be potentially 15% of the population.
(Petty is just the anglicised form. I have no loyalty to the French)
The better heuristic is to consider the revolutionary potential; how much value is given to private property and how much one benefits from the fall of the US empire. It cuts like a knife through warm butter and better illuminates which parts of the labour aristocrats, proleteriat in the west and the petite borugoisie to target.
https://redsails.org/stalins-shoemaker/
Haha fair. Never seen someone use “petty” over “small”
Agreed. Also, nice, another one for my reading list