• @mindbleach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1182 years ago

    Forty-four billion dollars to not have the employees, offices, servers, code, reputation, vetting, or brand.

    And his hot new name for this smoldering ruin is… X.

    Absolute fucking child.

    • @drumstic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      I was 10 years old and got a GameCube game called Hot Wheels Velocity X. I hadn’t played it yet, but I told my friend I knew it would be cool because of the X.

      That’s what Elon is like, and again, I was 10 years old

    • @rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      This man needs to be investigated as a national security threat. There’s no way this isn’t intentional sabotage at this point. It’s not an accident that he got the money for this from Saudis who benefit from destroying twitter.

    • GatoB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -132 years ago

      Is not that bad lol he does that just to gain attraction and you are being baited

  • @aloeha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    792 years ago

    Imagine wanting to change the name of a world recognized company and the best you can come up with is “X”. 💀

  • @friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    712 years ago

    Wow. Nobody has ever thought of using an X in their branding before. What a brilliant idea. This man’s vision knows no bounds. 🙄

  • ssillyssadass
    link
    fedilink
    English
    492 years ago

    That’s very on brand for Musk, he seems to have an obsession with Xs.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    342 years ago

    No one should pay attention to the name change. Just keep calling it Twitter. Like people won’t acknowledge that he doesn’t call himself Kanye anymore because he’s a piece of shit and why honor anything he asks for?

      • @PlexSheep@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I mean, that’s stupid too. Just that it has been in existence for long enough. Maybe they will follow the simplification trend and idk remove one of the lines from the F.

  • deejay4am
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    Anyone who doesn’t believe Elon is taking Twitter on purpose is a fucking moron.

    • PHLAK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      362 years ago

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

      • @Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        I see that rule posted a lot, but imo it doesn’t really apply to people in power. Infact, trying to apply it to that context is actually dangerous… take Trump as a case study: he’s done immeasurable damage to the US and consistently skirts any kind of real consequence because we just keep giving him the village-idiot pass.

        Better to assume every action and outcome are calculated and intentional when we’re talking shit like oligarchs or politicians. Even if they sincerely are just a dumbass, hold them to that same standard, as we really ought to disincentivize dumbasses from running corporations/countries/etc anyway.

        • @PopularUsername@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Yeah it is exactly what people engaging in fraud rely on. The more money that is on the line, the less likely the heuristic works. Reddit had an obsession with popular heuristics. The whole point of one is to quickly make an assessment when you don’t have either the time or resources. It is not a proof, never has been. The other one people always bring up is Occam’s razor. All razors are heuristics, heuristics are never proof.

          Although in this case the claim is that Elon is intentionally tanking twitter, which is also a ridiculous claim.

    • arthurpizza
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      Just because he was good at buying his way in to tech companies doesn’t mean he’s smart.

        • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I do, and I’m tired of everyone pretending we haven’t wanted this to happen forever either. Twitter and Facebook gave the rise to celebrity worship that plagues us. Being able to follow their every waking moment like you’re a part of their circle or something has been a pox.

          More importantly, a massive company never dies a “peaceful” way. There’s no “glorious death” for a corporation or entity. It’s always a train wreck of bad decisions and failed attempts to save the ship going under. They do not simply run out of money and go quietly into the night when they are a high profile brand. The nicest death a company this size can hope for is being quietly folded like taffy over and over, into other companies like AOL was.

          • @WrittenWeird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            I won’t pretend to not be enjoying the shitshow along with you, but celebrity worship has been around LLLOOONNNGGG before social media, and will continue to be so until there are fewer than 3 humans left alive on the planet.

          • @scottywh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            Yeah… I pretty much agree really.

            It’s entertaining to laugh at as it goes down in flames, too.

  • noneya
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    Might as well put a placeholder in for the logo. Seems like Twitter is well on it’s way towards being sold to Truth Social or some other neo-Nazi organization.

    For the record, I deactivated my account yesterday. 4,000 followers over the past few years, but it was time.