• potatoguy@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    12 days ago

    Oracle makes the worst database system ever imagined by anyone ever. Can’t even insert multiple rows in the same statement, you have to put multiple insert statements and Oracle sues you for dreaming about any other database.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Techs like to deride sales and managers for incompetence. But Oracle is proof that salesmanship and suits can take garbage and make billions.

      I remember around 1990 when Oracle handled their tech problems by making it illegal to review their product. ( You had to purchase their product to use it or be sued. And the purchase agreement required that you not publish a review of the product without their approval or be sued.)

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I would argue that selling a product that engineers need to create and maintain at great cost to the company (both monetary and in terms of frustration etc) and customer relations is in fact incompetence.

        or at least that’s how I see if from my own dealings with the sales guy at work. “okay yes I see you have an idea, but can we nail down a product definition, describe where we add value, and identify how it is different than these two other globally established products on the market right now?” nope, all he could do was be a little bitch about it. apparently he had customers lined up, though.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 days ago

    I cannot imagine any business leader crunching the numbers and concluding it’s better to stay with Oracle. I would order an all-hands-on-deck effort to rejigger the company database needs to get out from under these parasites.

    Only explanation I got it that they are unwilling to stall current projects and/or hire more backend devs while sorting it out. And yes, I am well aware it’s a monstrous task, even for a small company.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s cheaper in the long run, which is probably about 5 years, maybe less. Those fees are astronomical.

      In fact, I’d be willing to donate some time to help a small business transition to Postgres.

  • Arancello@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    12 days ago

    SAP does this too. I watched as a ‘license enforcement’ mob conjured up an ‘ indirect user ‘ concept to charge a top 10 ( in our country) client $10million for misusing SAP software for payroll and finance. The group was called Global Customer Assistance or some similar euphemism. It was all bogus. The client immediately started a program to rip out all SAP software. To my knowledge this is now complete. This customer abuse program was started when a number of senior execs moved from Oracle to SAP in the US.

  • Sasha [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    My job only exists because it was cheaper to hire several thousand tech workers to replace all the oracle products in house over several years than to keep using Oracle lmao