• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    CMV: this movement only matters to stupid people, and does not qualify as something “I should know”.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I’m open to any valid arguments for why it would matter, but I haven’t seen any. People who think land size should correspond to representation are…to be more diplomatic: not making any effort to think things through.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ll split this into two:

      only matters to stupid people

      People who are interested in geography, geometry, cartography, political science, geopolitics, culture, cognitive biases, ethnocentrism… generally not a low IQ cohort.

      and does not qualify as something “I should know”

      Ironically this might be true, just not for reasons that are flattering to you…

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        People who are interested in geography, geometry, cartography, political science, geopolitics, culture, cognitive biases, ethnocentrism

        I maintain that none of those people are the ones interested in this movement, and if you believe they are, you haven’t spent any time thinking about it. Again, I’m looking for any actual legitimate argument in support of it. A condescending argument from hypothetical authority isn’t going to cut it.