• RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 months ago

    I cant even think of any legit reason to do this. To protect children? The government does not care about children. Its why so many suffer in poverty. Watching tits online is the least of their problems.

    The only reasons i can think of is control. Forcing people to give up more information about themselves. Because knowledge is power.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      The reason is that we all live in capitalist dictatorships masquerading as “democracy”, and are rapidly approaching a time when climate change, wealth inequality, and automation will see widespread revolt of the proles, so the ruling class is tightening its grip, and going all in on fascism.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s really simple.

      The western democracies want to create a universal digital ID wallet and have that be required to access any site.

      There are a lot of reasons they could want this. For example, there are probably tens of millions of fake accounts controlled by adversarial nations which are used to sow extremism and disinformation online. It is impossible for counterintelligence to detect these at scale. We can see the corrosive effects that social media is having on society, there are countries actively working to make the problem worse but we have no tools to stop them.

      This is also why there is a big push to limit children from accessing social media. They’re often the targets for these campaigns because they’re easily manipulated and have a lot of free time to spread the misinformation once they’re indoctrinated.

      I don’t think a digital ID is the way to solve this problem. But, we’re not being asked or informed about why it is happening. They’re, instead, trying to ram these measures through using moral panic about children so anybody opposing them is easily dismissed as “not caring about The Children” or “supporting sex trafficking/pedophiles/predators”.

      I understand the situation, but they’re trying to go around the democratic process by not talking about the problems.

      • jnod4@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        So they’re trying to censor any influence from adversarial nations to keep people from voting on politicians that would undermine the countries integrity?

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The problem of social manipulation via bots isn’t limited to intelligence operations, though I would argue that this is the most immediate danger.

          We’re also seeing a huge spike in advertising bots pretending to be normal users just to push goods and services.

          Because of these motives social media has become less about bringing people together and more about extracting information from people in order to more efficiently manipulate them.

          It’s causing social media to become actively dangerous to society in general. Ensuring that everyone is a human is an essential first step for having ethical online social interactions.

          Just look at the difference in conversations on Lemmy vs Reddit. Sure, there are some assholes here and there but it’s largely a calm place where you can have an actual conversation.

          This is how online discourse used to be from the early BBS days right up until Facebook and algorithmically curated feeds discovered that fear, outrage and anger are the best drivers of engagement.

          Now, in addition to the platform’s manipulation (which is largely commercially motivated) we have LLMs which let anybody with funding create massive armies of fake people who can dynamically insert themselves into conversations in order to push any messaging you can imagine.

          It’s a bad situation that needs an immediate solution.

          I just don’t like that the solution has been decided on, in secret, by western democracies and is being forcefully implemented in a manner that also allows intelligence/law enforcement a backdoor into everything. (A digital ID also makes it very easy to view every users complete Internet history because that data is tagged with the users actual identity).

          • Devolution@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            So we must censor everything to protect us from misinformation which allows the censors to determine what is available and what is lot.

            Sounds an awful lot like China.

            Geez Brits. One shit decision after another. Just like your western children.

            US: Father, why did you vote for Brexit?

            UK: Son, who are you to talk? You voted for Trump twice. Now shut up before your mother chimes in…

            France: No wonder I took the house in the divorce and left you with your father.

            US: Well at least I didn’t abandon my affair baby Haiti.

            France:…

            UK: Did you really have to go there son?

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              So we must censor everything to protect us from misinformation which allows the censors to determine what is available and what is lot.

              Yeah, I think this is a terrible way to address the problem and very likely a way for elites to re-assert their control over information sources using this emergency.

              It’s certainly not about ‘protecting children’ in the way that they’re presenting it.

      • baru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        In the EU similar stuff is promoted by companies wanting to profit from supplying the various required software.

      • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Bullshit. Our leaders want more power over the masses, they want to become autocrats, that’s it. Fuck them.

  • shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    the brits really need to learn from the french how to protest. it’s been nearly a month and i haven’t heard of even a measly car being set on fire, just one petition that got a reply akin to “lol, nah”. the french would’ve set a car on fire for less is all i’m saying

  • mysticmartz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We need to build a decentralised internet quickly using I2P or something similar and scale and decentralise quickly. VPN’s will be the first to go then TOR after they attempt to control the exit nodes .

    We need to show the governments that we are allowed to use encryption and Wikipedia and not be treated as criminals for wanting privacy .

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Scotland might finally leave the UK because of this. It has been close before, but this must do it by now.

  • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Complacency has led us to this dystopia. Start Pirating & torrenting. Support Alternative platforms Fund dark-web tech

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Email your MEPs, push back on the narrative that it protects children. IF it even did protect children it would be at the cost of any semblamce of privacy. Politicians are also exempt despite a pedo politician leading a major world power right now.

      I got an immediate response explaining their stance is based almost entirely around the disemination of csam.

      It is a noble goal but akin to ending traffic deaths by mandating getting and checking the coast is clear every 10 meters.