Title

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Tax. Noone wants their money to be taken away. But it’s probably a good idea to have at least some government funded stuff.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Prison seems the obvious one. It’s obviously (to me, that is) not desirable to deprive anyone of their freedom, but for persistently violent people I don’t think there’s a better solution, unfortunately.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      nah, the justice system is absolutely fucked. in a world where we remake the law around restorative and rehabilitative justice rather than punitive, we’re probably not even going to be calling it “prison” anymore

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Police. As much as I hate their current incarnation, I. Some form or fashion they are required to handle those that do harm to others intentionally.

    • DempstersBox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Except here’s the thing: in every form and fashion, they don’t actually do anything to the ones doing the most harm

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Government.

    In an ideal world, everyone would get along and coordinate effectively in a voluntary manner. There would be no need for any government to enforce laws or provide services.

  • TheBeege@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Money. It encourages greed, but it allows us to scale exchange of goods and services far more than we otherwise could

  • T3CHT @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lobotomy, electroshock and castration are historic treatments for various extreme mental disorders that were, probably mistakenly, considered necessary evils lacking other treatments.

    These days prozac, benzos and lithium fall into a similar category.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m not sure if you’re comparing SSRIs to castration but I’m gonna assume you’re not.

      I dont think any prescriber would consider any of those medicines necessary. a much better example would be steroids like prednisone. it weakens your immune system, but it’s absolutely necessary at times.

      SSRIs are rarely necessary, but are a useful tool. too much to say on this.

      Benzos are a short term solution to enable more longer term treatments. they’re absolute monsters of a drug class, but really effective for sure.

      fentanyl would be a better example of a necessary evil. it’s synthesis revolutionized surgery.

      finally, lithium is a funny example – we still don’t even really know how it works!! but it’s a mood stabilizer and can be hugely beneficial for managing bipolar disorder. that said, one can attempt to manage bipolar symptoms without medications, but it’s certainly going to be harder and possibly less effective

    • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not sure why anyone’s downvoting this. If someone you’ve never met thinks that you have to put your life on the line, and therefore may possibly die, to further a cause - let them explain that cause. If they can’t convince you it’s more important than your life, then maybe it isn’t.

      See: Vietnam, etc.

      Edit: My bad, I was thinking, “What’s a good example of evil?” - Conscription should never be “necessary”. The only thing conscription does is protect the status quo. Keep the upvote - it was an honest mistake on my part.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Vietnam is a good example of a bad example. WWII is a better example of the necessary evil part, especially countries that were invaded.

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Necessary for what? The word necessary implies a goal. Evil also implies a religious type objective morality. I don’t think though, that for the goal of living a happy life, any harm is theoretically necessary.