Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi recently told EU diplomat Kaja Kallas that Beijing did not want to see Russia lose in Ukraine, not because it directly supports the conflict, but because it feared a U.S. strategic realignment against China. If Russia were to falter, Washington could shift its full focus to the Indo-Pacific. While some EU officials were surprised by Wang’s frankness, the comment underscores a widely held belief in Beijing—that a Russian defeat would upend the delicate balancing act China has maintained amid great power rivalry.

Wang further rejected accusations that China was materially aiding Russia’s war effort, claiming that if Beijing were truly providing such support, the conflict would have ended long ago. These remarks, while diplomatically calibrated, reinforce the view that China and Russia perceive their geopolitical fates as closely intertwined.

Ukrainian nationalist accounts have gone into a tailspin about this. I almost feel sorry for you people. We did try to warn you!

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    … not because it directly supports the conflict, but because it feared a U.S. strategic realignment against China.

    i suspect that this self-interested strategy is going to lead to the sino-soviet split part 2

    • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I don’t think it will in the short term since Russia needs allies and the West has made it clear they will never be allies with Russia. Russia doesn’t gain anything by splitting with China now or in the short term.

      Much longer term it was always bound to happen. Russia only gets critical support around here because it’s going against the West in this specific conflict. It’s still a capitalist country with reactionary views on a lot of things.

      That’s going to eventually put it at odds with China and other AES countries unless there’s a change in power in Russia.

    • Avatar of Vengeance@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      With all due respect, I put little stock in gloomy historical analogies without any materialist analysis to back them up

      I have a lot to say about China and Russia’s development strategies and foreign relations if we actually got into the details

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        no respect to be lost; i know little more than your average american liberal and i’m genuinely interested in reading it.

        i’ve run into people on lemmy who know considerably more about dialectical materialism than i do and i posted that comment in the hopes that one of them will see it and respond with a knowledge drop that helps dispels that gloomy perspective you detected.

        • Avatar of Vengeance@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Well I’ll try to summarize I guess reasons to be hopeful about development in Asia and the difference between Russia and India or even Brazil but I’m doing a dumbass thing where I use my phone in the middle of the night instead of going back to bed so get Russia and the Long Transition from Capitalism to Socialism and/or Maldevelopment by Samir Amin off of Anna’s Archive and I will brb