• ALoafOfBread
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The main problem with the train would be that once you get to those cities, they are massive, sprawling, and lack good public transit.

    So hopefully they improve the transit situation in the cities & surrounding areas as well.

      • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3112 days ago

        Oh, I knew the feds had cancelled grant money to it, I didn’t know the state killed it. I know they’re all in the pocket of big oil, but it’s just wild to me how trains are apparently woke.

        • @FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3312 days ago

          They are woke because they have potential to improve lives regardless of class, race, or gender. Obviously they should have to “earn” those improvements by buying a car instead.

          • @Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            711 days ago

            Quite literally this is why a lot of public transit got cancelled and destroyed - it made it easier for “those people” to come to the wealthier white parts of the city. In my city they literally built an interstate straight through downtown to make it harder for the large black population here to get out of the traditionally-black parts of the city.

            • @SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              611 days ago

              I keep recommending The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America by Richard Rothstein. In the book, he documents how the modern suburb was created through zoning in order to keep Black people out by making living there too expensive, both through the land cost and the car needed to navigate it. It’s really crazy just how open and deliberate it was!

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 days ago

      The main problem with the train would be that once you get to those cities, they are massive, sprawling, and lack good public transit.

      We can’t build mass transit because then we might need to build more mass transit.

      Also, it would be entirely impossible to expand local mass transit after the intrastate rail broke ground but before it was finished. Couldn’t be done. But we somehow can completely rewire I-45 to facilitate more interstate trucking.

    • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 days ago

      Well, you’ve got to start somewhere. CAHSR has been the impetus for a lot of sprawled out central valley cities to get their shit together. Fresno is probably the prime example of this. We’re trying to drag Merced into getting its shit together, though kicking and screaming it may be.

  • @FundMECFS@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    (Seriously tho those wide urban highways split up a city as much as a river does. It looks like the Hudson in NYC with those massive bridges).

    • @5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      412 days ago

      I’m too lazy to do that, but maps of Texan cities where their highways were edited to water bodies would really prove this point.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod
    link
    fedilink
    English
    912 days ago

    Land is more important than people. That’s why Wyoming gets the same number of senators as California.

  • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    612 days ago

    If it was a new interstate or an extra lane on the Katy freeway, nobody would be saying shit. My favorite example is how there’s in interstate project in the northeast that’s pretty much as overbudget as CAHSR and basically nobody is talking shit about it.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 days ago

      Steal land. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. Steal it again. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. If anyone complains, tell them that you shouldn’t care about the latest set of owners because they bought it off you when you stole it from the last set of owners.

      Don’t ask who profits. It’s definitely not six families who showed up wealthy and have only ever been getting richer for the last century.

  • @TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 days ago

    I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35

  • @dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    412 days ago

    I don’t know that that’s an “average Texan,” I think that’s more “average massively wealthy landholding Texan.”

    • @FundMECFS@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      912 days ago

      Certainly is average Texan voter. They vote for this.

      (Although they’ve mostly been indoctrinated from a young age so the blame is more on the corpocratic state elite than the population).