• @JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    17523 days ago

    Honestly this is a great joke but also could legitimately be a good service for someone who didn’t feel safe walking alone, or needs help navigating

          • @LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            Not really the same. Charging for this would discourage people from using it. They have to make a choice on feeling safe vs. spending money.

            This gives everyone the option and subsidizes it to the entire community.

            This is exactly why socializing things like this is beneficial.

            Every service has a cost. That cost is the value of the labor being provided. But we decide as a society that providing services like this benefits everyone living in society. Regardless of if they use it directly or not.

            When people say “free” in this context that’s what they mean. They mean the decision based on personal finance is removed.

            We don’t want people choosing personal finance over safety or health. Removing that dependency benefits everyone.

              • @LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                422 days ago

                Glad you got that! Its a major point in talking about social programs. If you can see this in college programs you can see the benefit when applied to social programs as well. Not sure if I can convince you of that too. But it’s always nice to get a response of “that makes sense” in this context.

          • @BussyCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            216 days ago

            It’s also run by people vetted by the school who are also employees so they generally have other responsibilities and then the service doesn’t generate a profit. Which is a long way of saying it’s not even remotely close to being the same

      • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1522 days ago

        I found out in my senior year, that my campus had been plagued by a serial rapist for several years, going back to before i was a freshman, and the school had covered it up. I only found out about it when i learned that my roommate’s girlfriend had a sorority sister on a full-ride scholarship to keep her quiet about being raped in her freshman year.

        Suddenly, the pressure to use their chaperone service became clear.

      • @exasperation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1223 days ago

        John Mulaney has a joke about how his parents knew Bill Clinton that way, from all going to undergrad together at Georgetown. Apparently all the women loved being escorted by Bill Clinton, and the men were all jealous.

        • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          1823 days ago

          Tbh, it makes sense. You don’t end up being president by being a no-rizz fool. You may be considering bringing up Trump as a counter-argument, but just look at all the people that are letting him pound them in the ass right now.

      • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        322 days ago

        My school had a number you could call and they’d dispatch a golf cart with 2 student workers to take you anywhere on campus for free, 24/7 (minus holidays and breaks when University offices were cosed).

    • stebo
      link
      fedilink
      1023 days ago

      how can it be this cheap though? sure it doesn’t require gas but it takes longer so the guy would need more pay for the service right?

      • @wunami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1223 days ago

        The business model is to make it cheap initially by subsidizing it with investor capital. So, the gig worker may be paid more than the user is being charged. Then, eventually raise the price once the user base is large enough and dependent enough on it (or the prior alternative is sufficiently put out of business).

      • @explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        323 days ago

        If they actually matched up with the routes other people might take, I would do it. I’m always walking around downtown anyways, but I’m a relatively large poor-looking man so I never get hassled.

    • @BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      216 days ago

      Speaking as a person who does not fit the demographic for this service, the big problem I see with it is how you trust that the walking buddy is actually going to be safer than nothing. Uber drivers are somewhat regularly in the news for assaulting women and I know several women that don’t like riding them alone

  • @db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    8023 days ago

    It’s at least 5 years old and it seems every single year the news outlets “fact check” it and declare it false.

    Meanwhile we have actual conspiracy theories on official government websites and those same outlets say nothing.

    I hate this timeline.

  • @boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    2023 days ago

    For the first time, I saw a car with Uber stickers in my country. Wanted to peel them off, but I also don’t wanna get in a fight over it. Pretty sure it’ll mostly be used by foreigners because the local alternative has several years of advantage and is also a multinational now.

  • qyron
    link
    fedilink
    1623 days ago

    I don’t say this much but that is actually a good idea, considering the amount of people that live very lonely and isolated lives. Maybe this can help some people to talk, enjoy another’s company, etc. Maybe. Everything else the effing internet and tech companies tried only managed to push people apart…

    • @Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      1323 days ago

      Except that it gives predators an easy way to be alone with drunk women. I wouldn’t trust Uber’s security checks.

      • @dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        You don’t have to trust the security checks, but they had to submit their personal information and documents to Uber, and would be easy to find if they did anything. And have two devices actively recording their location. That’s much better than an anonymous stranger, and I doubt a predator would go through all that instead of just, you know, remaining an anonymous person on the street.

  • @ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    This is routing from LaGuardia airport in NY, meaning the “walking” route has you taking a subway. Maybe the walking buddy is a local NYC thing meant for people who want assistance navigating the trains. I never see this on my app tho so it must have been a trial feature.

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1123 days ago

      i assume, if this were real, which it isn’t, the idea would be that everyone on the app has to pass a background check, so if you’re walking through an unfamiliar neighborhood and you’re a class of person who has reason to fear walking alone, you’d have someone there with you to help you be just a little more safe. obviously not as good as an actual trusted friend, but for certain people in certain situations, better than nothing

        • @Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          423 days ago

          No different than getting in an Uber or taxi for that matter, except it’s harder to escape a car on the highway.

        • The Quuuuuill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          223 days ago

          no for sure. it’s just we live in hell and there’s gonna be times you’re gonna be somewhere and you’re like “even a pretend friendly stranger who sucks will be better than nothing”

          • @corvi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            323 days ago

            Even more so, a pretend friendly stranger that’s documented as being in your location.

      • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        023 days ago

        So they can’t hire anyone in the class of people who’d have reason to fear walking around in certain neighborhoods?

        Women, trans men, and certain minority groups would be discriminated against in their hiring? Or would using this service come with the risk of someone that’s more likely to get you targeted?

        I feel like this wouldn’t work for many reasons.