• N3Cr0
    link
    fedilink
    6519 days ago

    True, but it also reminds us what happens when someone on Lemmy gets downvoted, reported and banned for having their own valud standpoint, which is not accepted by the majority of us.

    We should keep in mind that we are prone to making the same mistake.

        • @eleitl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          817 days ago

          I’ve been online since early 1990s and this is my repeated empirical experience that communities with a technical entry threshold self-select for technical users initially.

          Most social network users are already hopelessly confused by the concept of federation and need to pick up an instance.

            • @eleitl@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              114 days ago

              In a sense. There was a varying threshold technical bareer of entry to BBS, ARPANET/Internet, email, Usenet (uucp over dialup for early adopters), mailing lists, forums and communities like Hacker News, even early Reddit and Digg.

    • kratoz29
      link
      fedilink
      English
      518 days ago

      Is there any instance that has a poll for Linux questions for the registration yet? If there isn’t I would be surprised.

  • @CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1617 days ago

    That’s literally all of the Internet, not just Reddit. Everyone putting themselves in echo chambers and tuning everything else out. Modern Internet is just people wanting to be told they’re right and be showered with worthless affirmations.

    • @blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      417 days ago

      It has a similar problem, but a better version of it.

      From my point of view, Lemmy creates its bubble just by being friendly to one subset of views and hostile to another; and so people with some subsets of views don’t feel welcome - and they leave. This creates a kind of bubble effect; but I’m ok with that - because frankly there are some views that I really don’t want to see here anyway. Having diversity of views is good, but establishing social norms about what is acceptable or unacceptable isn’t necessarily a bad thing either.

      On the other hand Reddit (in addition to the above effect) also has a big dose of top-down enforcement. Effectively it has a small hidden group of people who can control what everyone else is allowed to say. They can ban certain words and sentiments; and use techniques like shadowbanning or just algorithmic demoting to reduce the influence of stuff they don’t like. So they get a bubble as well, but the bubble can be guided and influenced by the people who control the platform. For my point of view, that makes it worse.

    • @Patrikvo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1519 days ago

      According to the investor page from Reddit, they have 100 million unique users. Kicking a few hundred here and there doesn’t have an impact on that number. At that point individual users are worthless to the firm.

      Ironic how they refered to their rule #1 “Remember the human”, when I got permabanned for litterly nothing.

  • @Flemmy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1318 days ago

    To me the Bitcoin and crypto subs were a really weird place. Like 1 in 10 are long term investors and the rest are like “lol just wasted my grandparents savings I’m done. And just 20.”

    • @ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      718 days ago

      The futurism sub was the fucking weirdest, at least for a really popular front-page sub. Every other post in there is some kind of bizarre prayer to the machine god or something. There are literally people in there planning for how they’re going to use all their free time and wealth once they gain access to some kind of digital messiah AI that they think is going to emerge sometime in the next several years (or the last several years, they’re really loose with predictions) and when it does, it will grant them and everyone else god-like powers to play the stock market and become fabulously wealthy and immortal.

      None of that is a joke. When asked about how literally everyone can become wealthy, they usually just pile on you for being “narrow minded” and make references to how a very small number of people back in the 80’s doubted the internet was going to be a big deal.

      • 3DMVR
        link
        fedilink
        English
        318 days ago

        Singularity lol, any ai sub sucks if you were actually curious about technical info and its progress, they only would post sensationalized shit like full ai generation, nothing interesting like how davincis dropping ai magic mask, which should compete with ai plugins for adobe after effects, no idea if they drop a colormatching one but if they do resolves even more peak than it already is

    • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      318 days ago

      Isn’t that like wsb most of the time, they act like nothing biggie. Alot of them are rich or trolls

  • ekZepp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    I’m all in for discarding opinions. As long as who post them can argue in a civil maner, show souces and accept objective data.

    • @Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      118 days ago

      Totally agree. As soon as you see name calling you know the person is a clown. And “I think” or “I feel” is not undeniable facts. I will disagree with “objective data” which sounds like not accepting the source. Forget the source. Something is either true or it isn’t.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    718 days ago

    Also, “they” is currently 80% chatbots

    Fuck reddit, fuck spez

  • Lovable Sidekick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Banning is just an administrative action. The sentiment behind it is just as present on lemmy and everywhere else. Social forums tend to turn into echo chambers as ordinary users, who don’t have ban power but wish they did, use downvotes to suppress whatever they don’t agree with.