• southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10515 days ago

    So, sundar pinchai can be added to the list of CEOs that suck?

    Because a lot of the time, it’s weird that when the company does nasty shit, nobody names him as the head asshole in charge the way that other companies and ceos get handled.

    The dude has been in the driver’s seat for pretty much every major deterioration of Google/alphabet for years.

    • @Enelop@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7915 days ago

      He donated a million to Trump’s “inauguration” and sat in the VIP section, he was already a CEO that sucks.

      • @Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -55
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Was yours? Commenting online isn’t exactly fighting the good fight. Did you do anything to help shore up and defend anything.

        These companies face legal action from the government that was elected. A government elected who won power by spreading their shitty ideology everywhere.

        • @darthelmet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          714 days ago

          I’m not talking about personal actions. I personally believe in equality and I wish I could do more about that even if there are all sorts of personal reasons that’s difficult for me.

          Corporations don’t believe anything. They’re just profit optimizing machines. They were doing rainbow capitalism when they thought it would be more profitable and now that they think the opposite is more profitable, they’ll do that. It’s as simple as that and hoping corporations would be allies in a fight for equality was always based on a misunderstanding about power.

          It’s not like corporations don’t have power that can resist government action. Look at how effectively they’ve evaded taxes and regulations. The big international ones can threaten to take their ball and leave if they don’t like a country’s policies. And that’s when they don’t just bribe politicians to change them.

          The workers at those companies are people though. Labor organizing was always going to be necessary to build up power for change. Not saying it’s easy and I can’t fault someone for worrying about losing their job, but if resistance was going to happen anywhere that’s where it would be. Not in boardrooms or alone in a booth.

          But there’s the difference. It’s one thing to have convictions but not the means or courage to act on them. It’s another thing to have power, but lack convictions beyond whatever is currently convenient. The former could overcome those obstacles given the right circumstances. The latter never will.

    • @samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4414 days ago

      It’s too hard to change anything, but only if it’s progressive policies. Fascist policies can be implemented immediately.

      • @TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        914 days ago

        It’s too hard to change anything if one believes in laws, rules and the general idea of a fair justice. They don’t have this limitation.

    • @Sizing2673@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2514 days ago

      This is what’s fucking shitty about this

      Every company and every politician and every person who bends over so willingly IS THE PROBLEM

      It’s like they announce their regime and these idiots roll out the red carpets immediately ready be the first company to suck the government off

      If they all stood their ground, it would buy more time

    • The Menemen!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      814 days ago

      They didn’t capitulate. They never fought. They just did what was the best shot at earning money and gaining ground at the time.

      Don’t ever expect moral based behavior in capitalism or geopolitics.

    • @FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      213 days ago

      They didn’t capitulate. They were mostly faking it all along, friend. It made for good profit at the time and to get good Blackrock or Vanguard investment money. This is why despite putting rainbows in X, or FB, or YT, or LinkedIn profiles in the USA or in some Western countries, no company ever did that in any profile outside the West. It was all for show… and money. If they actually believe it they would have done so across the board. Yet they didn’t. They were just hoping most people wouldn’t notice. Many did. There was a meme RE: this floating around from years ago, too.

    • @ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      714 days ago

      Welcome to how the world has always worked and always will. There’s gin to help wash the black pill down.

    • LucasWaffyWaf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      414 days ago

      It’s like Roko’s Basilisk playing out in real time, except instead of building a malignant computer out of fear it’s accelerating a fascist takeover.

  • @skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5715 days ago

    When an influential group of powerful people make hate speech a part of their standard rhetoric, is EXACTLY when you MUST block it on your platform, not a signal that it’s time to start letting it slide, you fucking pricks.

    • @Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Pichai kissed the ring. He’s colluding with the person who tried to overturn the elections and install himself as a ruler.

      All of the billionaires that were at the inauguration are in the same boat. I’m at a point where I believe the crimes of any of them should be tried and convicted with the punishments being doled out collectively to all colluders, but that’s me.

      I’d be going for the death penalty from the prosecution side, since it seems like that is what we do now to people who cause one or more people to die, no matter how unethical the victim(s) were.

      • @vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 days ago

        I wonder if Tim Cook is there too. It would make sense for him and Apple to resist this at least somehow but…

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4614 days ago

    More proof Rainbow Capitalism was a lie/ad campaign to take more money from queers.

    I wish I could rub this in the face of every cishet who said Rainbow Capitalism was actual progress.

    • @InsincereLogic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      914 days ago

      (For reference: I am cishet, but have family & friends in the LGBTQ+ community and consider myself an ally.) Usually just lurk, but I feel you so badly.

      I’ve been saying it forever as well. They’re spending millions, to specifically target/advertise/appeal to the community… out of the goodness of their hearts? Right.

      Then as soon as its “over”, the facade drops and its on to the next big event/target market. Rinse and repeat.

      • @daddakamabb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        214 days ago

        As a cishet I saw it what was as soon as they started it. It was about 10-15 years ago. It was sleazy then, and it’s sleazy now. They are just trying to milk the population as much as they can. They don’t give two fucks about inclusiveness or equality. They know a large portion of Americans want equality. So it’s a cash cow.

    • @deepfuckingdumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      914 days ago

      I mean, in the past companies wouldn’t be caught dead associating with LGBTQ+ people, let alone take their money. Now LGBTQ+ is acceptable enough for predatory advertising so…idk progress from like a fucked up capitalist perspective I guess?

  • @PerfectDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4515 days ago

    And people judged me for watching YouTube with uBlock Origin, or via NewPipe for eons.

    Look who’s laughing now.

    • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      youtube is too infested with ads, to make me disable ublock origin for my favorite channels. in anycase most of the channels become greedy pos overtime anyways. outside of pet one/animals/stem ones, ones that are just gossip or reaction or like mr beasts videos are no good.

    • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      215 days ago

      YouTube on mobile is intolerable these days. NewPipe is the way for Android, though Google is in a constant battle to disable it.

  • @ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4015 days ago

    Showing how truly performative their big “ally” push was during the pandemic. All their BLM and diversity support was just as performative. Big corporations are just sycophantic monsters riding trends. Avoid them where possible.

      • luluu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        814 days ago

        PeerTube isn’t bad, it just has no content

        • @AnjunaSouls@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          514 days ago

          Yeah, and the platform is set up in a way that hinders onboarding and discoverability of what’s there (at least, compared to youtube’s approach…). These are all problems that prevent it from replacing YouTube. If you read Peertube’s official site they even say upfront that they’re not trying to be a YouTube replacement

        • Muyal_Hix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          214 days ago

          It is kinda bad. Especially when it comes to finding content or getting noticed

      • @nibble4bits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        714 days ago

        It’s always a question of money. It costs money to make quality content. YouTube has content because they share ad revenue to their content providers. That expands the more popular the content is because there are more ads displayed. That revenue lets the creators expand their capabilities with better gear and stage sets. Federated networks usually depend initially on volunteers and alternative ways of earning revenue for those instances besides ads.

        • The Menemen!
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Tbh money could be the initiative. So many content creators nowadays have platforms beside YouTube. Often even self hosted weboages. If a federated alternative would come up, they could just set up an own server and keep all the earnings.

          This would somehow need to get started though. No idea how.

        • @moonbunny@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          214 days ago

          It’s even more difficult since the content has to be stored somewhere, and needs to be streamed which requires storage and processing power, with the latter needing to be able to scale so the user experience doesn’t get bogged down by new people joining.

          The entire revenue model of compensating the host and content creator does require a rethink, but it’s hard to see how that could be done without paywalling access to host, view, and/or both of the above.

        • Suite404
          link
          fedilink
          English
          114 days ago

          Kind of. I think more than that YouTube has the traffic and people go where traffic is. Especially content creators. Many content creators have patreon accounts or similar to help pay the bills. And I rarely watch YouTube without an ad blocker, which I would assume is becoming more common. Can’t exactly pay creators with revenue that isn’t there.

    • @Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1014 days ago

      It used to say gender expression and identity. If it doesn’t, that’s a deliberate decision that could cause enforcement calls like ‘well that’s not your REAL gender so this isn’t harassment’.

      • @fxdave@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -114 days ago

        I mean… It’s already over-specified compared to others: “sex, gender or sexual orientation”. It’d be equally right to criticize religion for why don’t they write “belief, spiritualism, religion”, and to include identity, and expression.

        They should just write “sex stuff”, and everyone is happy.

  • @rob200@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3215 days ago

    This was bound to happen after the election results just a matter of time. Also, hate speech related content possibly gets a lot of clicks. So capitalism benefits. Next is, possibly but hopefully not, Bluesky’s official server.

      • @rob200@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        615 days ago

        Hopefully. If Youtube did it, who’s to say now that Bluesky may or may not jump ship? It’s an industry. However, i’m mainly pointing at the main server, other servers on Bluesky might not jump ship so fast, or not at all (ideally).

  • AwesomeLowlander
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention ‘sex, gender, or sexual orientation’, which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.

    • @patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1315 days ago

      “Gender” means nothing without context. By a MAGAs definition of gender this policy doesn’t protect trans people, for example. We don’t know how this rule will be interpreted in practice. Even if you don’t consider the intent behind making this change, this is objectively a weaker guarantee of protection than what we had with “gender identity and expression”.

      • AwesomeLowlander
        link
        fedilink
        English
        715 days ago

        This is not a legal contract, it’s a general guideline for users about what is or isn’t acceptable. The intent and spirit of the terms are clear, the only question is whether Google will enforce them not. If the enforcement is crappy, like what Facebook is famous for, it doesn’t matter a damn what exact terminology they use in the guidelines.

      • AwesomeLowlander
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1015 days ago

        No, but I think most of the people on Lemmy should know better than that.

        Looks at Hexbear, .ml, and to some extent Blahaj

        Oh, who am I kidding.

      • AwesomeLowlander
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 days ago

        It doesn’t. It’s not like this page gets used internally. They have their own internal guidelines for that.

  • @ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3115 days ago

    That is why centralized platforms, especially powerful ones, are sitting ducks waiting to become even more corrupt. Why more people are not leaving centralized services is a crime against humanity as it is clear that supporting theme means society suffers.

  • @MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2915 days ago

    There is one thing that is vital that is missing from peertube. Effective monetization.

    By watching on peertube I am a drain on resources. A net negative. I’d happily pay to offset those costs and more, but I want it to be shared amongst multiple creators and hosters.

    I don’t want to just support one, I want to support most of the network for the hosting and bandwidth, and a certain amount divided amongst the creators I watch.

    If PeerTube introduces some sort of payment / monetization solution, it might get more creators as well. Without it I can’t see it growing fast enough to compete with YouTube in the near future.

    Well… Sooner or later the costs of Full HD compressed video will be negligible for hosting and bandwidth, so that might be when YouTube gets a real challenge. So I guess we’ll see

  • @spicehoarder@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2915 days ago

    I hated Google far before it was cool. I would feel vindicated if it weren’t so damn overdue. They don’t even contribute meaningfully to society. And I mean that about EVERYTHING

    Gmail is lame, their search engine sucks, chrome wastes resources, their ads platform ruined the internet, Golang fundamentally sucks, the emulation layer of android is so fucking wasteful, Material Design ruined digital creativity, etc.

    • RobotsLeftHand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1515 days ago

      Google search feels like it has stopped being the magic it was. Now whenever I search for something I might not find it underneath all the stuff on sale. For the first time in I don’t know how many years I’ve been finding myself using something else like Duck Duck Go.

        • @13igTyme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          215 days ago

          I used to use Google shopping to find certain items and compare websites. Now the entire left side that used to be a filter list is replaced. When you click a “filter” option it just adds text to the search bar. Then it will include an essay about why these are your options for something and recommend top brands, but then just list everything.

      • @AnjunaSouls@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        314 days ago

        Yep, that’s intentional. They stopped prioritizing user experience and started prioritizing ad revenue instead a while ago