• @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    663 months ago

    So not just they pirated them, which may or may not be a crime and where I may or may not be impartial, but they are also leeches who would be banned on any decent torrent tracker of the olden days.

    • @Podunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      333 months ago

      Truly despicable. Seeding to at least 1 to 1 is the bare minimum of courtesy and humanity. If you dont, its unethical

      • @1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Seeding shouldn’t be done on ratios - being the only one seeding 10 seasons of a tv show and getting it to 0.4:1 is way more helpful than seeding the same movie as everyone else and getting to 20:1, you’re noy contributing anything there other than decreasing your bandwidth for things that aren’t already at 100,000% availability

        • @Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          143 months ago

          I’d you are the only one seeding it and get to 0.4, you just left others hanging with incomplete downloads.

          However I do agree in general

          • @1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            63 months ago

            That’s what I’m saying

            It’s better to not even half-way seed a torrent with low availability than it is to seed one that everyone else is seeding, regardless of how high your ratio goes - it’s a point on how pointless it really is to waste your resources seeding something like that

            • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              53 months ago

              The lazy approach is the best approach IMO. Seed everything, and if the ratio gets high, drop it. That way you get rid of useless popular torrents and keep the less popular ones. If everyone does that, things will work better.

      • @CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        103 months ago

        Hey now some of us just have wildly shit upload speeds and couldn’t hope to reach 1:1 without spending an entire year seeding a single movie.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          That’s a big part of why I stick with my ISP. My download speeds aren’t super competitive for the price, but my upload is half my download, which is nice.

  • @spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    653 months ago

    Another example of Republican principles. Corporations are protected by laws but not bound by them, while the average citizen is bound by laws but not protected by them.

    • Kilgore Trout
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      What does this have to do with the Republican party? The other party upholds the same copyright law.

  • Singletona082
    link
    fedilink
    English
    443 months ago

    So where’s the MAFIAA? Here you go guys, literal industrial scale piracy.

    Or are you afraid to go after someone that isn’t a teenager in their parent’s back room?

      • Singletona082
        link
        fedilink
        English
        253 months ago

        I am aware. I was simply demonstrating they were never about money, simply bullying people who couldn’t fight back.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Especially since in the height of my pirating years during teenagerdom, no amount of cajoling or coercion could get me to pay for whatever it was because I didn’t have any money. Which not at all coincidentally was why I was pirating it in the first place.

          These dweebs always operate from the frankly invalid preconception that if the pirate had not pirated the media they would have paid for it and therefore they’re “owed” a sale, but that’s not how it works. I imagine that if the vast majority of people were unable to pirate their thing, they simply would not watch/listen/read/play/consume the thing at all.

    • @Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      The real shit deal is if there was a ruling against Meta in this, it would still be worse for everyone because there would be precedent to litigate against people who only consume pirated content (which has been tried in several countries and found to be legal)

      • Singletona082
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        …Oh god…

        you described a situation where i want Meta to win…

  • Mohamed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    403 months ago

    This is irrelevant because Meta should not be tried for this the same as a private individual would be.

    The case for torrenting being illegal for private individuals is one or both of:

    1. Downloading in of itself is stealing.
    2. Uploading is giving unauthorized access to someone else who otherwise might have had a harder time finding it. Anything else, such as watching, reading, listening, learning, etc. is not illegal (or does not make sense to make illegal). The exception might be publishing. This is rare for private individuals (e.g. using pirated FL studio to make a commercial song).

    For corporations, a lot change. Firstly, a corporation downloading a torrent is necessarily making unauthorized material available for some people of the company. It’s like a group of 20 friends all downloaded and uploaded to each other. Secondly, they used this copyrighted material commercially (like playing pirated music in a public night club). Both should be illegal.

    However, all of this is still a distraction. The real issue is using copyrighted materials to train commercial AI. Does Meta require permission from copyright holders to make AI based on their work? The law is grey on this, and desperately needs regulations.

    Just my thoughts.

    • @Geodad@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123 months ago

      AI has already stolen everyone’s work. The internet is officially a free for all.

  • JackOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    293 months ago

    Also I love how they they don’t say they didn’t seed, just say there is no proof

    • @FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      This is a motion to dismiss not an answer. That’s how those work. It is linked to by the journalist in the article.

  • daikiki
    link
    fedilink
    English
    263 months ago

    It’s not illegal to download books without yourself offering them for upload. What’s illegal is when you feed those books into your reality devouring content monster and it outputs all that copyrighted content in a slightly different order and you profit off that content vomit.

  • @distortwave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    223 months ago

    Well, at least they released llama for free, But honestly, their hypocrisy is so pathetic.

    Hey, who knows? Maybe now they’re gonna like start funding legal defense funds for people torrenting. Part of their whole corporate social responsibility, If they feel so strongly about it… right? /s

  • bean
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    Rules for thee and not for me, plus we PROFIT off of it to boot. But none of you guys can do that. Only for Richys.

  • John Richard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    Well good news if they are successful in their arguments it can set precedent to make piracy legal.