Summary:

The launch of Chinese AI application DeepSeek in the U.S. has raised national security concerns among officials, lawmakers, and cybersecurity experts. The app quickly became the most downloaded on Apple’s store, disrupting Wall Street and causing a record 17% drop in Nvidia’s stock. The White House announced an investigation into the potential risks, with some lawmakers calling for stricter export controls to prevent China from leveraging U.S. technology.

Beyond economic impact, experts warn DeepSeek may pose significant data security risks, as Chinese law allows government access to company-held data. Unlike TikTok, which stores U.S. data on Oracle servers, DeepSeek operates directly from China, collecting personal user information. The app also exhibits censorship, blocking content on politically sensitive topics like Tiananmen Square. Some analysts argue that, as an open-source model, DeepSeek may not be as concerning as TikTok, but critics worry its widespread adoption could advance China’s influence through curated information control.

  • Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s open source and can be hosted locally, I don’t think there are issues with national security in this case.

    There is money to be lost though. Always follow the money.

  • MrNesser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You did something cheaper quicker and it’s more efficient it must be bad the US

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just like EV’s and battery technology. Up to 40% tarrif on some brands.

      They are cheaper with more range. The range is literally only achievable through better technology and hardware.

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s true that working conditions is not the same at all in China, which also makes this possible.

          Put the technology is still better, even if they acquired it cheaper than possible in the US.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    National security, anti-terrorism, protecting children.

    The trifecta of reasons given for abolishing freedoms

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the first two reasons are not even legitimate in theory. Nationalism is a plague destroying the planet. “Terrorism” is a fake word reserved for enemies of the state.

  • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is just so fun to watch.

    America: “Executive order now! No US person is allowed to help the Chinese develop these technologies! We will imprison you traitor!”

    China: “OK. We’ll just develop it ourselves.” DeepSeek enters the chat

    America: “Fuck! National security emergency!”

  • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    as Chinese law allows government access to company-held data.

    … Kind of exactly like how US law allows government access to company-held data?

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you’re living in the imperial core violently genociding the planet to make a quick buck, of course everything is a security concern and opportunity for the MIC to profit.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they’re limiting focus to the Chinese app then they’re noir wrong. If they mean the whole model then they’re full of crap.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. Perhaps while all the idiots are busy devising a “plan” to address this, those evil brain leave everyone else alone.

  • stardust@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s open source so why not just take the best parts of it and run it themselves if it is such a worry instead of relying on their app and website.

    • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re pissy cause it being open source and more efficient means that it’s gonna be more cost effective for people to use. Which is real bad if your company overcommitted to the slop and needs to recover losses.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This.

      I can easily see the national security argument for people sending queries to CCP-controlled servers (unfortunately people put all kinds of sensitive information into prompts).

      Whether people like it or not, that is potentially risky. I don’t know if China has blocked OpenAI-hosted stuff, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they have for similar reasons. If they haven’t, they should consider it.

      But attempting any bans the model itself, even when ran locally, would be conclusive evidence that they’re doing it just to harm a competitor.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weaselly little liars.

    Deepseek released the model and showed how they made it. You can run it locally. It doesn’t connect to the internet.