• adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    2 years ago

    most of that ‘hundreds of billions’ isn’t going to go towards the tech or infrastructure, it’s gonna go to people. a very small number of specific individuals.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, I suspect that most of the money will be used to acquire or costume natural resources, like water and power.

      Individuals become enriched because their share holdings are worth more.

  • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Guys listen up, every deepseek model comes with a dedicated chinese spy, who will log all your data and send it back to CCP who will use it to plot the destruction of the western civilization.

    Instead we should use Freedom© models from OpenAI (side note if deepseek is so “open” how come they don’t have open in their name huh?) even if OpenAI don’t show their reasoning, they only do this cuz they want to protect us and they stand for our values.

    They cost 100x more only because they are fighting for our Freedom and Freedom doesn’t come cheap, Freedom doesn’t have a price, Freedom requires our sacrifice.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    The US is getting owned by China left and right, but sure lets focus on abusing minorities, women, LGBTQ+, and the poor instead of investing on actually making America great. Whatever.

  • conicalscientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah obviously we’ve completely lost the plot a long time ago. Nobody even remembers when tech was bands of ragtag nerds making something out of nothing. Now they are the rich whose only purpose to is extract more wealth. Tech what? Who even knows anymore.

    That includes the average tech workers. If that angers you then you’re lost too.

    Nobody has noticed that there’s more bragging about compensation than accomplishments. It used to be the other way around. Nerds eagerly showing off to anyone who will listen about whatever thing they cooked up. It’s been this way for the past long time long before this LLM AI era.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, give me a /technology/ sub that speaks about technology (have you heard about the esp-8266? Did you know a A4988 can steer a NEMA from a Raspberry pi? And even The 6 gen SSD can move X GB/s, what is the fastest quad core under 100$?) and not about funding and drama.

      Or am I out of touch with reality :-) ?

    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s because this wave of tech overlords rode in on the coattails of the actual smart group. No one in this new group has actual built/coded/designed anything good. Everything they actual get involved with is garbage. Musk Cyber truck and Zuck metaverse as two examples. Bezos isn’t even the CEO of Amazon anymore, and he had pretty much be letting Andy Jassy run AWS/Amazon for close to 2 decades anyway.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Necessity is the mother of invention.”

    What you’re likely seeing here is innovation similar to the early tech sector. The hardware limitation (no Nvidia chips) means different (usually more complex) solutions are needed.

    These solutions usually require a deep understanding of a specific area of mathematics, and expertise in coding. The person making it normally has to be heavily invested, since it still eats a lot of hours.

    I often joke, the mathematician who finds a faster algorithm for matrix operations is sitting on a billion dollar idea.

    • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      And that mathematician won’t see the profits for that faster algorithm and you will never hear their name - shits been happening in tech for decades

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    Again, this is all fucking stupid. China is giving this shit away for free to absolutely own the US for spending money on stupid fucking things like this.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its good for the consumer. If companies like deepseek weren’t just tossing them out there for anyone to use, Microsoft and Google would currently have a monopoly and it would all be subscription type services.

      It also greatly reduces whatever chance the copyright shills have of legislating against it.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not good consumers at all, at least no explicitly. There are already open and free LLM models out there anyone can use that are just as good as OpenAI, for example.

        What this is: a pretty simple deathblow to completely collapse the bullshit AI bubble in the US that was created by a bunch of wealthy idiots trying to fleece people out of money. Plain and simple.

        While I’m happy that this pretty much destroys the business of OpenAI and the others, this bullshit funding by executive order is a bailout for those people, right out in the open. It’s a classic Trump scam. Nobody will ever see where the money is going, and it’s taxpayer dollars going right back into the banks of millionaires billionaires who were about lose the their asses for investing in this stupid shit in the first place.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don’t really follow. Open source is still a net benefit regardless of the goverments investment in closed source, especially for the consumer.

          I agree it’s highly likely there’s a scam going on but healthy competition will probably force them to actually use some of the fund. If they had a monopoly, it would be easier to give us a minimal viable product and call it a sound investment. They can’t be too blatant about it after all.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean Meta opened up Llama for free a while ago. But at the end of the day, the AI models posed to actually impact things are those integrated or integrateable into workflows, and those are all still more or less locked down.

  • The Chinese model has chain of thought that u can see. The model when asked to talk about chinas atrocities will go through a chain of though process outlining all the atrocities then conclude its not allowed to tell u. Cool technology tho I’m just waiting for a dolphin fine tuning.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you run it locally, there’s no filtering on the outputs. I asked it what happened in 1989 and it jumped straight into explaining the Tiananmen Square Massacre.

    • Phantom_Engineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been playing around with the offline version of the model. It’s interesting, but I think we’ll have to wait for people to tinker with the open source base for awhile before we get something really great.

    • SamboT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah all the info is there and something switches it over to the generic response.

      So fucked.

    • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m using the 8b model and it’s having no problem telling me about China’s atrocities.

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    well I mean the USA’s president is a scammer so I am not surprised he is involved in stuff where scammers are abundant nowadays like crypto and AI

  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    China has a huge advantage in AI models because of how lax they are on intellectual property rights. US companies are fighting over API licensing costs, while china is just going to scrape everything and use it for free.

    The US has a lead now, but I don’t think they can maintain it without giving up on ethical training. Then again it may not matter if the US models are ethical if everyone will eventually just uses the superior unethically trained chinese models instead.

    • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      The US companies already scraped the data while they could. If anything, data scraping is far far more difficult now for everyone due to technical reasons.

      Most of the new models are trained on synthetic data or higher quality of data or with RLHF. The reason deepseek is able to perform is likely because LLMs are very very new things, there are many low hanging fruits. Its no longer just about the data we already hit that limit for quite some time.

  • Sumocat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Earlier this week, DeepSeek unveiled its R1 model, which, the startup claims, meets, if not exceeds, performance from OpenAI’s o1 model released last year. (o1 is designed to tackle reasoning and math problems.)” — Oh, so China built their for math and we built ours for garbage. Interesting approach.

    • [deleted]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Building garbage and convincing people it is absolutely necessary to pay someone for it is the American way.

      • probably2high@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Almost as if one culture values education and actual problem solving while the other values spectical and sleight of hand.

  • Embarrassingskidmark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Of course it’s faster & cheaper when it’s being censored & can’t access half of human history because the fucking ccp finds it offensive.

    • probably2high@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is going to sound wild, but why not use your brain for creativity, and use the the machine for crunching numbers?